Published on in Vol 7 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/57041, first published .
Social Media Use and Serious Psychological Distress Among Adolescents

Social Media Use and Serious Psychological Distress Among Adolescents

Social Media Use and Serious Psychological Distress Among Adolescents

Authors of this article:

Riti Shimkhada1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ninez A Ponce1, 2 Author Orcid Image

1Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, , Los Angeles, CA, , United States

2Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, , Los Angeles, CA, , United States

*all authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Riti Shimkhada, MPH, PhD




Increasing recognition of the potential dangers of excessive social media use on mental health has led to numerous calls for restraint and associated legal cases, as highlighted by the recent advisory issued by the US Surgeon General [1-3]; however, these dangers remain understudied. We examined social media use trends between 2019 and 2021 among adolescents in California. We further examined the association between almost-constant social media use and psychological distress using 2021 data, controlling for familial dynamics and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), which are predictors of mental health [4] but have largely been overlooked in previous studies.


Survey and Data Collection

We used the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) 2019-2021 data sets [5] for adolescents aged 12-17 years to examine trends in social media use. For a regression analysis examining the association between almost-constant social media use and psychological distress among adolescents, we used the 2021 data set with responses from 24,453 households, including 1169 participating adolescents. The CHIS randomly selects one adult to interview in each randomly sampled household, wherein households are selected using a geographically stratified address-based sample design. Following parental permission, surveys are conducted directly with a randomly sampled adolescent in the household. The survey, conducted either on the web or by telephone, includes a comprehensive set of health-related questions. Respondents are asked to report on typical daily use of social media on the following scale: less than a few times a day, a few times a day, many times a day, and almost constantly or more. We categorized this scale into a two-category variable wherein the category “almost constantly or more” is referred to as almost-constant social media use. Psychological distress was measured using the Kessler 6 series [6]; for this analysis, we examined the category of likely having had serious psychological distress in the past year. Family connection was measured through a series of questions, including how often the adolescent felt they were able to talk to family about their feelings, how often they felt family stood by them during difficult times, how often they felt safe and protected by the adult at home, and how often they had at least two nonparent adults taking a genuine interest in them. Adolescents responding “little to never” to any of these questions were assigned to a group characterized by little to no family connection. Adolescents responding having had at least one ACE were assigned “yes” to the ACEs variable.

Statistical Analysis

Demographic variables, including age, gender, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, were included in the analysis as covariates. The data were weighted to account for the complex survey design and to generate population-level estimates. We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine the association between almost-constant social media use and serious psychological distress, controlling for demographic characteristics, family factors, and ACEs. All analyses were conducted using STATA 16.1.

Ethical Considerations

This study used deidentified, publicly available data, which does not constitute human subjects research as defined by regulation 45 CFR 46.102 of the US Department of Health and Human Services [7], and thus does not require ethics board approval. All CHIS respondents receive an initial survey invitation letter with a US $2 preincentive. Participation is voluntary and all participants provide informed consent before participating in the survey.


Almost-constant social media use for the youngest teens (aged 12-14 years) increased significantly between 2019 and 2021, whereas this increase was not noted for older teens (aged 15-17 years). Among 12-14–year-old females, the rate of almost-constant use was 18.1% (95% CI 11.2-25.0) in 2019, 22.2% (95% CI 15.4-29.1) in 2020, and 28.9% (95% CI 20.8-37.0) in 2021; among 15-17–year-old females, the rate of almost-constant use was 33.0% (95% CI 25.8-40.2) in 2019, 26.9% (95% CI 20.8-32.9) in 2020, and 29.1% (95% CI 20.8-37.3) in 2021. Among male adolescents, almost-constant social media use increased significantly between 2019 and 2021 for both age groups. Among 12-14–year-old males, the rates were 11.9% (95% CI 6.2-17.6) in 2019, 22.7% (95% CI 16.4-28.9) in 2020, and 23.7% (95% CI 18.4-29.0) in 2021; among 15-17–year-old males, the rates were 14.1% (95% CI 9.8-18.4) in 2019, 22.4% (95% CI 17.3-27.6) in 2020, and 28.9% (95% CI 22.9-34.9) in 2021. By 2021, there were no longer significant differences in almost-constant social media use according to age group.

The rates of almost-constant social media use were the highest for teens living in poverty, those who have experienced ACEs, those who reported little to no family connection, and those who reported serious psychological distress (Table 1).

Regression analyses suggested a significant positive association between almost-constant social media use and psychological distress controlling for ACEs, family connection, and demographics (Table 2).

Table 1. Association of characteristics of adolescents (12-17 years old) with almost-constant social media use from the California Health Interview Survey 2021 (N=1169).
CharacteristicAlmost-constant social media use, % (95% CI)
Total (all adolescents)27.62 (24.19-31.35)
Age (years)
12-1426.23 (21.48-31.61)
15-1728.98 (24.30-34.16)
Gendera
Female28.97 (23.61-35.00)
Male26.35 (22.40-30.72)
Federal Poverty Level (%)
<30033.19 (27.65-39.23)
≥30022.61 (19.26-26.35)
Raceb
Asian28.66 (21.02-37.76)
Latino30.23 (24.95-36.09)
Black, African American, and other22.72 (12.81-37.04)
Two or more27.94 (17.60-41.31)
White23.17 (18.21-29.01)
Serious psychological distress
Yes37.36 (31.09-44.09)
No22.63 (19.27-26.38)
Adverse childhood experiences
Yes36.17 (30.72-42.01)
No20.95 (17.48-24.91)
Family connection
Little to none34.02 (28.47-40.04)
More than little22.21 (18.42-26.52)

aWhile the California Health Interview Survey collects data on nonbinary gender, for sample size considerations, we report only male and female categories here.

bThe sample size was too small to produce reliable estimates for the Black/African American population alone, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander populations.

Table 2. Association between almost-constant social media use and serious psychological distress among adolescents (aged 12-17 years) from the California Health Interview Survey 2021 (N=1169).
VariableAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI)P value
Social media use per day.003
Almost constant1.673 (1.204-2.323)
Less than almost constantreference
Age (years).003
12-14reference
15-171.710 (1.205-2.429)
Gendera.005
Female1.597 (1.155-2.209)
Malereference
Federal Poverty Level (%).92
<3001.017 (0.709-1.460)
≥300reference
Raceb
Asian0.641 (0.377-1.089).10
Latino0.674 (0.469-0.967).03
Black, African American, and other0.807 (0.357-1.824).60
Two or more1.133 (0.617-2.079).68
Whitereference
Adverse childhood experiences<.001
Yes2.403 (1.736-3.327)
Noreference
Family connection<.001
Little to none2.171 (1.502-3.139)
More than littlereference

aWhile the California Health Interview Survey collects data on nonbinary gender, for sample size considerations, we report only male and female categories here.

bThe sample size was too small to produce reliable estimates for the Black/African American population alone, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander populations.


Our work is the first to examine the association between social media use and psychological distress controlling for ACEs and the adolescent-reported level of family connection, both of which are significantly associated with psychological distress [4]. Even when controlling for these and other demographic variables, almost-constant social media use remained significantly associated with psychological distress. Our key limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the data. Other limitations include the analysis of self-reported data on social media use, which may be subject to recall or social desirability bias, and possible other confounders not included in the analysis. Our work is consistent with prior research that finds increasing trends in use of social media among the youngest teens [8] and potential adverse mental health impacts from high or almost-constant social media use [9-12].

Data Availability

The data sets analyzed for this study are publicly available from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research's California Health Interview Survey Public Use Files (PUFs) website [5].

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. Health advisory on social media use in adolescence. American Psychological Association. 2023. URL: https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advisory-adolescent-social-media-use [Accessed 2024-05-02]
  2. Social media and youth mental health: the U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2023. URL: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/sg-youth-mental-health-social-media-advisory.pdf [Accessed 2024-05-03]
  3. Orben A, Blakemore SJ. How social media affects teen mental health: a missing link. Nature. Feb 2023;614(7948):410-412. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Scully C, McLaughlin J, Fitzgerald A. The relationship between adverse childhood experiences, family functioning, and mental health problems among children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Family Ther. Apr 2020;42(2):291-316. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14676427/42/2 [CrossRef]
  5. California Health Interview Survey (CHIS). UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. URL: https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/our-work/california-health-interview-survey-chis [Accessed 2024-05-07]
  6. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. Aug 2002;32(6):959-976. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. 45 CFR 46. US Department of Health and Human Services. URL: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html [Accessed 2024-05-07]
  8. Vogels EA, Gelles-Watnick R, Massarat N. Teens, social media and technology. Pew Research Center. 2022. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/ [Accessed 2024-05-03]
  9. Huang C. A meta-analysis of the problematic social media use and mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry. Feb 2022;68(1):12-33. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Purba AK, Thomson RM, Henery PM, Pearce A, Henderson M, Katikireddi SV. Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. Nov 29, 2023;383:e073552. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Shannon H, Bush K, Villeneuve PJ, Hellemans KG, Guimond S. Problematic social media use in adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health. Apr 14, 2022;9(4):e33450. URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2022/4/e33450 [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Valkenburg PM, Meier A, Beyens I. Social media use and its impact on adolescent mental health: an umbrella review of the evidence. Curr Opin Psychol. Apr 2022;44:58-68. [CrossRef] [Medline]


ACE: adverse childhood experience
CHIS: California Health Interview Survey


Edited by Sherif Badawy; submitted 02.02.24; peer-reviewed by Ahmed Hassan, Sayan Mitra; final revised version received 15.04.24; accepted 22.04.24; published 23.05.24.

Copyright

© Riti Shimkhada, Ninez A Ponce. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 23.5.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.