This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Mobile Apps for Pregnancy and Parenting Education (43) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (225) Mobile Health and Apps for Maternal and Child Health (149) Pediatric ICU (PICU) (11) Perinatal Education for Parents (219) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (300) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2929)

Published on in Vol 7 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/56247, first published .
Digital Health as a Mechanism to Reduce Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions: Retrospective Cohort Study

Digital Health as a Mechanism to Reduce Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions: Retrospective Cohort Study

Digital Health as a Mechanism to Reduce Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions: Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Alison K Brinson1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Hannah R Jahnke1 Author Orcid Image ;   Natalie Henrich1 Author Orcid Image ;   Christa Moss1 Author Orcid Image ;   Neel Shah1, 4, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (1) Metrics

    1Maven Clinic, , New York, NY, , United States

    2Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, , Chapel Hill, NC, , United States

    3Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, , Chapel Hill, NC, , United States

    4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, , Boston, MA, , United States

    5Harvard Medical School, , Boston, MA, , United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Natalie Henrich, MPH, PhD


    Background: Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is costly and has been associated with financial and emotional stress among families. Digital health may be well equipped to impact modifiable health factors that contribute to NICU admission rates.

    Objective: The aim of the study is to investigate how the use of a comprehensive prenatal digital health platform is associated with gestational age at birth and mechanisms to reduce the risk of admission to the NICU.

    Methods: Data were extracted from 3326 users who enrolled in a comprehensive digital health platform between January 2020 and May 2022. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate the associations between hours of digital health use and (1) gestational age at birth and (2) mechanisms to reduce the risk of a NICU admission. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the associations between (1) gestational age at birth and (2) mechanisms to reduce the risk of a NICU admission and the likelihood of a NICU admission. All analyses were stratified by the presence of any gestational conditions during pregnancy.

    Results: For users both with and without gestational conditions, hours of digital health use were positively associated with gestational age at birth (in weeks; with gestational conditions: β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04 and without gestational conditions: β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04) and mechanisms that have the potential to reduce risk of a NICU admission, including learning medically accurate information (with gestational conditions: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; P<.001), mental health management (with gestational conditions: AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05; P<.001), and understanding warning signs during pregnancy (with gestational conditions: AOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.11; P<.001). For users with and without gestational conditions, an increase in gestational age at birth was associated with a decreased likelihood of NICU admission (with gestational conditions: AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.69; P<.001 and without gestational conditions: AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53-0.65; P<.001). Among users who developed gestational conditions, those who reported that the platform helped them understand warning signs during pregnancy had lower odds of a NICU admission (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89; P=.01).

    Conclusions: Digital health use may aid in extending gestational age at birth and reduce the risk of NICU admission.

    JMIR Pediatr Parent 2024;7:e56247

    doi:10.2196/56247

    Keywords

    digital health; education; gestational conditions; Maven Clinic; mental health management; neonatal; NICU admissions; neonatal intensive care unit; mobile phone 


    In the United States, most newborns who are born prematurely (before 37 weeks, 0 days gestation), with low birth weight (<2500 g), or with a health condition requiring special care are admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [1]. In 2022, approximately 9.5% of all infants born in the United States were admitted to the NICU [2]. NICUs are essential, as they improve infant survival and reduce morbidity for premature and sick infants [3]. However, admission to the NICU is costly and has been associated with financial and emotional stress among parents [4,5]. The parent-infant separation and parental stress resulting from NICU admission have been associated with poor maternal-infant attachment [6], lower breastfeeding rates [7], and higher rates of postpartum depression and anxiety [8], all of which may compromise subsequent pediatric health and development.

    Several risk factors at the maternal level contribute to a higher likelihood of premature birth, which in turn increases the risk of NICU admission [9-11]. Primary maternal risk factors for a NICU admission include advanced age, chronic disease, substance use, preeclampsia, and peripartum infection [12-14]. Further, maternal stress, anxiety, and depression during pregnancy are associated with low birth weight and preterm birth [15-17]. At the institutional level, otherwise healthy infants who are born at hospitals with a high number of NICU beds have an increased likelihood of a NICU admission [10,18].

    Previous interventions have successfully reduced the likelihood of a NICU admission with programs centered around increased patient education, access to care, and care coordination [19-21]. Digital health, including telemedicine and mobile apps, is increasingly used during pregnancy and may help address current gaps in prenatal care education by making pregnancy services more accessible and affordable [22,23]. By providing care coordination, continuous access to health care providers, and pregnancy-related educational materials, digital health may be well equipped to impact modifiable factors that contribute to NICU admission rates, including disease and mental health management.

    In this study, we use data from Maven, a digital health platform, to explore how the use of a prenatal digital health platform that provides access to educational materials, telehealth through care providers, and care coordination is associated with gestational age at birth and mechanisms that may mitigate the risk of a NICU admission. First, we aimed to investigate the association between digital health use with gestational age at birth and mechanisms that could reduce the risk of a NICU admission (ie, mental health management and pregnancy education). Second, we explored whether gestational age at birth and the mechanisms to reduce risk are associated with a decreased likelihood of a NICU admission.


    Ethical Considerations

    All users consented to the use of their deidentified data for scientific research upon creating a Maven account. This study used deidentified data only, and the protocol was designated as exempt by WCG IRB (waiver 45 CFR § 46.104(d)(4)), an independent ethical review board.

    Study Setting and Design

    This retrospective cohort study examined the associations between digital health use and NICU admission among pregnant individuals enrolled in Maven. Maven is a comprehensive digital health platform designed to support women’s and family’s health and complement routine prenatal care. Users receive free and unlimited access to Maven as an employer or health plan–sponsored benefit through their own or their partner’s employer. Maven provides a range of digital health education and support services within its platform. Users have access to a care advocate—an allied health professional such as a nurse or social worker—who serves as their primary point of contact within the platform. This advocate helps coordinate digital prenatal services and directs users to relevant providers and resources. Additionally, within the platform, users have access to articles, videos, live classes, and appointments with providers across a variety of specialties, including obstetrics and gynecology, mental health, nutrition, and others. This analysis used both platform-use data and user-reported data from the enrollment questionnaire (completed during pregnancy upon enrollment in Maven) and the postbirth questionnaire (completed after birth). Together, the enrollment and postbirth questionnaires collected data on user demographics, health characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and the impact of the digital health platform during pregnancy. Data were extracted from 5593 Maven users in the United States who enrolled in Maven’s pregnancy program and completed both health questionnaires between January 1, 2020, and May 27, 2022 (Figure 1). We excluded users who had previously given birth (n=1549), had a multiple pregnancy (n=689), conceived with fertility treatment (n=0), or reported any cigarette, drug, or alcohol use during pregnancy (n=29). These exclusion decisions were made due to the strong associations between experiences in a previous pregnancy or birth [24], multiple gestation [25], and drug or alcohol use with NICU admission [26], independent of other factors.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Flowchart of the users included in the current analysis.

    Outcome: NICU Admission

    The primary study outcome was the birthing parent report of a NICU admission on the postbirth questionnaire. After birth, users were asked “Did you experience any of the following complications during delivery?” and could select all that apply from a list of complications. Any users who selected “My baby went to the NICU” were considered to have a NICU admission in this analysis.

    Hours of Maven Use

    Hours of Maven use was the primary exposure in this analysis. The total number of active hours that each user spent on Maven was calculated from use data (automatically tracked within the platform) by summing the time spent with a care advocate, with a provider, messaging a provider, reading papers, attending web-based classes, or watching class recordings.

    Impacts of Digital Health Use

    This analysis examined the association between time spent on the platform with gestational age at birth and 3 pathways by which digital health may reduce the risk of a NICU admission (Figure 2A and B). Gestational age at birth was a continuous variable calculated from the difference between the user-reported due date (collected on the enrollment questionnaire) and the user-reported baby date of birth (collected on the postbirth questionnaire).

    The three mechanisms of NICU admission risk reduction were (1) mental health management, (2) learning medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications, and (3) understanding warning signs during pregnancy. Each of the mechanisms was assessed on the postbirth questionnaire. To assess mechanisms 1 and 2, users were asked “In what way did Maven influence your experience?” and could select all that apply from a list of ways Maven may have influenced their pregnancy, including “Maven helped me manage anxiety and/or depression” and “Maven helped me learn medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications.” If either of these options were selected, the item was coded as “yes,” and the items were coded as “no” if they were not selected. To assess mechanism 3, users were asked “Did Maven help you understand warning signs during pregnancy?” and users selected “yes” or “no.”

    ‎
    Figure 2. Conceptual model to explore the associations between digital health use and likelihood of an infant NICU admission. (A) Conceptual model to explore the associations between digital health use, gestational age at birth, and likelihood of an infant NICU admission. (B) Conceptual model to explore the associations between digital health use, mechanisms to reduce the risk of a NICU admission, and likelihood of an infant NICU admission. NICU: neonatal intensive care unit.

    Gestational Conditions

    Given the strong associations between gestational conditions and infant health outcomes [27], all analyses were stratified by the presence of gestational conditions. To capture information on conditions that developed both before and after enrollment into Maven, the following conditions were assessed on both the enrollment and postbirth questionnaires: cholestasis, gestational diabetes, intrauterine growth restriction, high blood pressure, preeclampsia, eclampsia, vaginal blood loss (nonlabor related), problems with the placenta, issues with the cervix, excess or diminished amniotic fluid, infant large for gestational age, perinatal mood disorder, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome. If a user reported the presence of any of the above conditions during their current pregnancy, they were coded as “Had at least one gestational condition” versus “No gestational conditions.”

    Covariates

    Data from the enrollment questionnaire were used to create covariates. Ethnicity and race were categorized into “Hispanic or Latinx” and non-Hispanic or Latinx: “Asian or Pacific Islander,” “Black,” “White,” and “other” (comprised of users who reported their race as multiracial or American Indian. This category was created due to a small sample size of users who identified as multiracial or American Indian). To account for the societal and geographical factors that contribute to a NICU admission, we used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) [28]. SVI is a geographic measure of community vulnerability by using data from 4 domains: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. A continuous SVI score was assigned to each user based on their ZIP code, with an SVI closer to 1 representing high vulnerability. Chronic conditions were assessed as cumulative risk scores, calculated by adding the number of medical conditions reported by each user. Users reported their mode of birth (vaginal or cesarean) on the postbirth questionnaire.

    Statistical Methods

    We conducted descriptive analyses to explore user demographic and medical characteristics stratified by the presence of gestational conditions. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to assess categorical variables, and 2-tailed t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess continuous variables.

    Adjusted linear regression was used to assess the association between time spent on the digital health platform and gestational age at birth (Figure 2; aim 1A). Adjusted logistic regression was used for all other aims. For aims 1A and 1B (Figure 2), assessing the associations between time spent using the digital health platform, gestational age at birth, and the 3 mechanisms to reduce the risk of NICU admission (mental health management, learning medically accurate information during pregnancy, and understanding warning signs during pregnancy), each component was assessed as an outcome in its own model. For aims 2A and 2B (Figure 2), examining whether gestational age at birth and mechanisms to reduce NICU admissions are associated with the likelihood of a NICU admission, each of the 4 components was assessed as the primary exposure in its own model with a report of a NICU admission as the outcome. Adjusted regression models controlled for age, race and ethnicity, mode of delivery, chronic conditions, SVI, and the number of days enrolled in Maven. All models estimated the effect with 95% CIs, and significance was determined when P<.05. All statistical analyses were performed using RStudio (Posit Software, PBC).


    Sample Characteristics

    Our analytic sample consisted of 3326 pregnant individuals enrolled in the maternity program on the digital health platform. The mean age of our sample was 32.3 (SD 3.89) years. In total, 22.5% (747/3326) of users identified as non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, 46.5% (1547/3326) as non-Hispanic White, and 14.3% (475/3326) preferred not to disclose their race and ethnicity status (Table 1). Relatively few users reported the presence of any chronic medical conditions, with thyroid disease being the most prevalent (248/3326, 7.5%). During pregnancy, high blood pressure (482/3326, 14.5%) and gestational diabetes (357/3326, 10.7%) were the most common gestational conditions reported. The mean infant gestational age at birth was 39.3 (SD 1.57) weeks. A total of 68.9% (1799/3326) of users reported the digital health platform helped them learn medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications, 59.7% (1912/3326) reported the platform helped them understand warning signs during pregnancy, and 13.8% (361/3326) reported the platform helped them manage their mental health. A majority of 70.8% (2354/3326) of users reported having a vaginal birth, and 10.6% (353/3326) reported their infant was admitted to the NICU.

    Compared to users who did not develop any gestational conditions during their pregnancy, users who developed one1 or more gestational conditions were less likely to be non-Hispanic White (44.1% [nn=613/1390], 44.1% vs. 48.2%[nn=934/1936], 48.2%) and more likely to be older (32.8 years y vs. 32.0 years); obese (21.3% [nn=296/1390], 21.3% vs. 9.4%[nn=182/1936], 9.4%); and have a a history of type 1 or type 2 diabetes (2.2% [nn=30/1390], 2.2% vs. 0.2%[nn=3/1936], 0.2%), hypertension (5.5% [nn=77/1390], 5.5% vs. 0.2% nn=3/1936], 0.2%), thyroid disease (8.9% [nn=124/1390, ]8.9% vs. 6.4% [nn=124/1936], 6.4%), anxiety (27.3% [nn= =379/1390], 27.3% vs. 18.5% [nn=359/1936], 18.5%), and depression (15.5% [nn=216/1390], 15.5% vs. 9.1% [nn=177/1936], 9.1%). Users with gestational conditions were more likely to report that the digital health platform helped them manage their mental health (15.9% [nn=177/1390], 15.9% vs. 12.3% [nn=184/1936, 12.3%]), deliver preterm (8.7% [nn=121/1390], 8.7% vs. 3.4% [nn=65/1936], 3.4%), have a baby who was admitted to the NICU (15.6% [nn=217/1390], 15.6% vs. 7.0% [nn=136/1936], 7.0%), and less likely to have a vaginal birth (62.7% [nn=872/1390], 62.7% vs. 76.5% [nn=1482/1936], 76.5%). The average amount of digital health use during pregnancy was 8.1 (SD 7.9) hours. Digital health use did not vary by the presence of gestational conditions.

    Table 1. User demographic characteristics and select chronic conditions across gestational conditions groupsa.
    Whole sample (N=3326)0 gestational conditions (n=1936)≥1 gestational conditions (n=1390)P value
    User characteristics
    Age, mean (SD)32.3 (3.89)32.0 (3.63)32.8 (4.18)<.001
    Race and ethnicity, n (%).03
    Hispanic325 (9.8)179 (9.2)146 (10.5)
    Non-Hispanic Asian747 (22.5)419 (21.6)328 (23.6)
    Non-Hispanic Black147 (4.4)71 (3.7)76 (5.5)
    Non-Hispanic multiracial or American Indian85 (2.6)49 (2.5)36 (2.6)
    Non-Hispanic White1547 (46.5)934 (48.2)613 (44.1)
    Prefer not to say475 (14.3)284 (14.7)191 (13.7)
    Social Vulnerability Index, mean (SD)0.38 (0.20)0.38 (0.20)0.38 (0.20).25
    BMI (kg/m2), n (%)<.001
    Underweight (<18.5)139 (4.2)92 (4.8)47 (3.4)
    Normal weight (18.5‐24.9)1906 (57.3)1229 (63.5)677 (48.7)
    Overweight (25.0‐29.9)803 (24.1)433 (22.4)370 (26.6)
    Obese (≥30)478 (14.4)182 (9.4)296 (21.3)
    History of chronic conditions, n (%)
    Thyroid disease248 (7.5)124 (6.4)124 (8.9).01
    Autoimmune disease99 (3)49 (2.5)50 (3.6).07
    Hypertension80 (2.4)3 (0.2)77 (5.5)<.001
    Diabetes (type 1 or type 2)33 (1)3 (0.2)30 (2.2)<.001
    Blood disorder24 (0.7)10 (0.5)14 (1).10
    Heart disease19 (0.6)8 (0.4)11 (0.8).15
    Thrombophilia16 (0.5)6 (0.3)10 (0.7).09
    Kidney disease11 (0.3)7 (0.4)4 (0.3).77
    HIV/AIDS1 (0)0 (0)1 (0.1).42
    History of reproductive conditions, n (%)
    Abnormal pap322 (9.7)176 (9.1)146 (10.5).17
    Polycystic ovarian syndrome223 (6.7)117 (6)106 (7.6).07
    Sexually transmitted disease104 (3.1)55 (2.8)49 (3.5).26
    Endometriosis74 (2.2)36 (1.9)38 (2.7).09
    History of mental health conditions, n (%)<.001
    Anxiety738 (22.2)359 (18.5)379 (27.3)
    Depression393 (11.8)177 (9.1)216 (15.5)
    Gestational conditions, n (%)—b
    High blood pressure482 (14.5)—482 (34.7)
    Gestational diabetes357 (10.7)—357 (25.7)
    Problems with the placenta217 (6.5)—217 (15.6)
    Preeclampsia, eclampsia, or HELLPc212 (6.4)—212 (15.3)
    Vaginal blood loss (excluding labor)198 (6)—198 (14.2)
    Infant large for gestational age145 (4.4)—145 (10.4)
    Excess or diminished amniotic fluid134 (4)—134 (9.6)
    Issues with the cervix100 (3)—100 (7.2)
    Intrauterine growth restriction90 (2.7)—90 (6.5)
    Perinatal mood disorder70 (2.1)—70 (5)
    Cholestasis56 (1.7)—56 (4)
    Pregnancy outcomes and complications
    Gestational age at birth (weeks), mean (SD)39.3 (1.57)39.6 (1.25)38.9 (1.86)<.001
    Gestational age at birth category (weeks), n (%)<.001
    Preterm (<37)186 (5.6)65 (3.4)121 (8.7)
    Early term (37-<39)717 (21.6)334 (17.3)383 (27.6)
    Full term (39-<41)2119 (63.7)1320 (68.2)799 (57.5)
    Late term (41-<42)295 (8.9)211 (10.9)84 (6)
    Postterm (≥42)9 (0.3)6 (0.3)3 (0.2)
    NICU admissiond, n (%)353 (10.6)136 (7)217 (15.6)<.001
    Vaginal birth, n (%)2354 (70.8)1482 (76.5)872 (62.7)<.001
    Mechanisms to reduce risk of a NICU admission, n (%)
    Mental health management361 (13.8)184 (12.3)177 (15.9).01
    Learning medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications1799 (68.9)1018 (67.9)781 (70.3).19
    Understanding warning signs during pregnancy1912 (59.7)1131 (60.7)781 (58.2).15
    Digital health use
    Digital health use during pregnancy (hours), mean (SD)8.10 (7.88)8.02 (7.64)8.21 (8.21).70

    aData are displayed for users who enrolled in Maven Clinic and gave birth between January 1, 2020, and September 19, 2022.

    bNot applicable.

    cHELLP: hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets.

    dNICU: neonatal intensive care unit.

    Associations Between Digital Health Use, Gestational Age at Birth, and Mechanisms to Reduce Risk of a NICU Admission

    In analyses of users who did not develop any gestational conditions during pregnancy, adjusted models revealed that for every 1-hour increase in digital health use, users experienced an increase in gestational age by 0.01 weeks (β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04); a 9% increase in their odds of understanding warning signs during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.07- 1.11; P<.001); a 3% increase in their odds of reporting that the platform helped the user manage their mental health (AOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05; P<.001); and a 4% increase in their odds of reporting that the platform helped the user identify medically accurate information (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06; P<.001; Table 2).

    In analyses of users who developed 1 or more gestational conditions during pregnancy, adjusted models revealed that for every 1-hour increase in digital health use, users experienced an increase in gestational age by 0.01 weeks (β=.01; 95% CI 0.0006-0.02; P=.04), an 8% increase in their odds of understanding warning signs during pregnancy (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11; P<.001), a 6% increase in their odds of reporting that the platform helped the user manage their mental health (AOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; P<.001), and a 5% increase in their odds of reporting that the platform helped the user identify medically accurate information (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P<.001).

    Table 2. Associations between hours of digital health use, gestational age at birth, and mechanisms to reduce risk of a neonatal intensive care unit admissiona.
    No gestational conditions (n=1936)≥1 gestational conditions (n=1390)
    Gestational age at birth (weeks)Understanding warning signs during pregnancyMental health managementLearning medically accurate informationGestational age at birth (weeks)Understanding warning signs during pregnancyMental health managementLearning medically accurate information
    Adjusted β (95% CI)P valueAORb (95% CI)P valueAOR (95% CI)P valueAOR (95% CI)P valueAdjusted β (95% CI)P valueAOR (95% CI)P valueAOR (95% CI)P valueAOR (95% CI)P value
    Digital health use (hours)0.01
    (0.0006-0.02)    		.041.09
    (1.07-1.11)    		<.0011.03
    (1.02-1.05)    		<.0011.04
    (1.02-1.06)    		<.0010.01
    (0.0006-0.02)    		.041.08
    (1.06-1.11)    		<.0011.06
    (1.04-1.08)    		<.0011.05
    (1.03-1.07)    		<.001

    aAdjusted for age, Social Vulnerability Index, mode of delivery, race and ethnicity, chronic conditions, and days on Maven.

    bAOR: adjusted odds ratio.

    Associations Between Gestational Age at Birth, Mechanisms to Reduce Risk of a NICU Admission, and the Likelihood of a NICU Admission

    In analyses of users who did not develop any gestational conditions during pregnancy, adjusted logistic regression models found that for every 1-week increase in infant gestational age at birth, users experienced a 41% reduction in the odds of their infant being admitted to the NICU (AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53-0.65; P<.001; Table 3). Understanding warning signs during pregnancy (P=.05), learning medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications (P=.33), and mental health management (P=.83) were not significantly associated with the odds of a NICU admission at birth.

    Table 3. Association between gestational age at birth, mechanisms to reduce risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and the likelihood of a NICU admissiona.
    0 gestational conditions (n=1936)≥1 gestational conditions (n=1390)
    Adjusted odds ratio of a NICU admission (95% CI)P valueAdjusted odds ratio of a NICU admission (95% CI)P value
    Gestational age at birth (weeks)0.59 (0.53-0.65)<.0010.62 (0.55-0.69)<.001
    Understanding warning signs during pregnancy0.73 (0.53-1.01).050.63 (0.45-0.89).01
    Learning medically accurate information1.22 (0.83-1.83).330.92 (0.61-1.42).71
    Mental health management0.95 (0.56-1.52).831.45 (0.83-2.42).17

    aAdjusted for age, Social Vulnerability Index, mode of delivery, race and ethnicity, chronic conditions, and days on Maven.

    In analyses of users who developed 1 or more gestational conditions during pregnancy, adjusted logistic regression models found that for every 1-week increase in infant gestational age at birth, users experienced a 38% reduction in the odds of their infant being admitted to the NICU (AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.55-0.69; P<.001; Table 3). Additionally, users who reported understanding warning signs during pregnancy experienced a 37% reduction in the odds of their infant being admitted to the NICU (AOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89; P=.01; Table 3). Learning medically accurate information about pregnancy and complications (P=.71) and mental health management (P=.17) were not significantly associated with the odds of a NICU admission.


    Principal Results

    The results of this retrospective cohort study suggest that the use of a comprehensive digital health platform during pregnancy helps users with and without gestational conditions extend their gestational age at birth, learn medically accurate information, manage their mental health, and identify warning signs during pregnancy. For all users, an increase in gestational age at birth was associated with a decreased likelihood of a NICU admission. Additionally, among users who developed 1 or more gestational conditions during pregnancy, those who reported that the digital health platform helped them identify warning signs during pregnancy had a 37% reduction in the odds of their infant being admitted to the NICU.

    Comparisons With Prior Work

    Studies have found that birth outcomes can be improved through resources that support and complement traditional prenatal care. Previously, these influential resources have involved care coordination, transportation to appointments, and education [19-21]. Similarly, digital health can provide continuous care coordination and increased access to providers and educational materials [29]. This type of continuous support has been shown to have several benefits: improving in-clinic conversations with providers, influencing one’s mode of delivery and birth plan [30,31], managing mental health throughout pregnancy [32], and enabling users to identify and address problems immediately (vs waiting until their next in-person appointment) [33]. Additionally, digital health provides a patient-centered approach to complement routine prenatal care throughout pregnancy [34]. While routine prenatal care is limited by time constraints and other clinical needs of each visit, digital health is especially equipped to provide patient education and offer individualized content that may address patient concerns between in-person appointments [35]. In our study, using a digital health platform was linked to mental health management, learning medically accurate information, and understanding warning signs during pregnancy. Additionally, understanding these warning signs was associated with a reduced likelihood of NICU admission. While mental health management and learning medically accurate information about pregnancy were not associated with NICU admission, improvement in perinatal mental health and education may still be important in mitigating the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes including NICU, and these factors should continue to be investigated in future work.

    In our sample, higher levels of digital health use were associated with an increase in gestational age at birth. It is important to note that while statistically significant, our effect size is quite small. For every 1 hour of digital health use, we saw an increase in gestational age by 0.01 weeks (approximately 2 hours). While the effect itself is small, identifying any signal is encouraging, given that an increase in gestational age decreases the risk of preterm birth and related complications, including a NICU admission [1]. This finding is consistent with previous research, which has shown that among pregnant individuals with gestational conditions, access to telehealth care is associated with a decreased likelihood of preterm birth [36,37]. Our results are especially promising because in this sample, digital health use was self-directed by the users. While the digital health platform offered resources and services aimed at reducing the risk of NICU admission, users were not given instructions on how frequently to use the platform and were not required to use specific types of care or resources. Future interventions with targeted protocols may yield even greater impacts.

    Among users with 1 or more pregnancy-related conditions, users who reported that the digital health platform helped them understand warning signs during pregnancy had a reduced likelihood of a NICU admission. Given the rapid changes that occur as a pregnancy progresses, a diagnosis of a clinical condition like gestational hypertension or diabetes in an otherwise healthy individual may yield questions or concerns that arise outside of a monthly prenatal care appointment [34,38]. Digital health platforms can offer access to providers as well as educational content to help users manage their diagnosis outside of traditional in-person care [39,40].

    Limitations

    Limitations of this study should be considered. First, our study population consisted primarily of commercially insured individuals who had internet access on a smartphone device or computer. Second, the majority identified as White and non-Hispanic, potentially limiting the generalizability and scalability of these findings.

    Conclusions

    Digital health use may aid in reducing the risk of a NICU admission by extending gestational age at birth and helping individuals recognize warning signs during their pregnancy. As the use of digital health during pregnancy increases, this model of care may serve as a blueprint for how digital services may contribute to disease management during pregnancy and improve birth outcomes.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors are grateful to Maven users for using the application and providing the data analyzed in this research.

    AKB was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (award T32 HD091058).

    Conflicts of Interest

    This research was funded by Maven Clinic through the employment of authors. HRJ, NH, CM, and NS hold positions at Maven Clinic and have equity in Maven Clinic, and AKB is a paid consultant for Maven Clinic.

    1. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Barfield WD, Papile LA, et al. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics. Sep 1, 2012;130(3):587-597. [CrossRef]
    2. Driscoll A, Osterman M, Hamilton B, Valenzuela C, Martin J. Quarterly provisional estimates for selected birth indicators, quarter 1, 2021-quarter 1, 2023. National Center for Health Statistics. 2023. URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/natality-dashboard.htm [Accessed 2023-11-10]
    3. Kim Y, Ganduglia-Cazaban C, Chan W, Lee M, Goodman DC. Trends in neonatal intensive care unit admissions by race/ethnicity in the United States, 2008-2018. Sci Rep. Dec 10, 2021;11(1):23795. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Lakshmanan A, Song AY, Belfort MB, et al. The financial burden experienced by families of preterm infants after NICU discharge. J Perinatol. Feb 2022;42(2):223-230. [CrossRef]
    5. Ionio C, Colombo C, Brazzoduro V, et al. Mothers and fathers in NICU: the impact of preterm birth on parental distress. Eur J Psychol. Nov 2016;12(4):604-621. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Leahy-Warren P, Coleman C, Bradley R, Mulcahy H. The experiences of mothers with preterm infants within the first-year post discharge from NICU: social support, attachment and level of depressive symptoms. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Apr 29, 2020;20(1):260. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Gertz B, DeFranco E. Predictors of breastfeeding non-initiation in the NICU. Matern Child Nutr. Jul 2019;15(3):e12797. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Pace CC, Spittle AJ, Molesworth CL, et al. Evolution of depression and anxiety symptoms in parents of very preterm infants during the newborn period. JAMA Pediatr. Sep 1, 2016;170(9):863-870. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Al-Momani MM. Admission patterns and risk factors linked with neonatal mortality: a hospital-based retrospective study. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(6):1371-1376. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Haidari ES, Lee HC, Illuzzi JL, Phibbs CS, Lin H, Xu X. Hospital variation in admissions to neonatal intensive care units by diagnosis severity and category. J Perinatol. Mar 2021;41(3):468-477. [CrossRef]
    11. Ziegler KA, Paul DA, Hoffman M, Locke R. Variation in NICU admission rates without identifiable cause. Hosp Pediatr. May 2016;6(5):255-260. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Ilyes SG, Chiriac VD, Gluhovschi A, et al. The influence of maternal factors on neonatal intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality in premature newborns from Western Romania: a population-based study. Medicina (Kaunas). May 26, 2022;58(6):709. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Verbiest S, Ferrari R, Tucker C, McClain EK, Charles N, Stuebe AM. Health needs of mothers of infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Ann Intern Med. Dec 1, 2020;173(Suppl 11):S37-S44. [CrossRef]
    14. Boukakiou R, Glangeaud-Freudenthal NMC, Falissard B, Sutter-Dallay AL, Gressier F. Impact of a prenatal episode and diagnosis in women with serious mental illnesses on neonatal complications (prematurity, low birth weight, and hospitalization in neonatal intensive care units). Arch Womens Ment Health. Aug 2019;22(4):439-446. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Lilliecreutz C, Larén J, Sydsjö G, Josefsson A. Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on the risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Jan 15, 2016;16(1):5. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Rose MS, Pana G, Premji S. Prenatal maternal anxiety as a risk factor for preterm birth and the effects of heterogeneity on this relationship: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1-18. [CrossRef]
    17. Mochache K, Mathai M, Gachuno O, Vander Stoep A, Kumar M. Depression during pregnancy and preterm delivery: a prospective cohort study among women attending antenatal clinic at Pumwani Maternity Hospital. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2018;17:31. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Harrison WN, Wasserman JR, Goodman DC. Regional variation in neonatal intensive care admissions and the relationship to bed supply. J Pediatr. Jan 2018;192:73-79. [CrossRef]
    19. Stankaitis JA, Brill HR, Walker DM. Reduction in neonatal intensive care unit admission rates in a Medicaid managed care program. Am J Manag Care. Mar 2005;11(3):166-172. [Medline]
    20. Masten Y, Song H, Esperat CR, McMurry LJ. A maternity care home model of enhanced prenatal care to reduce preterm birth rate and NICU use. Birth. Mar 2022;49(1):107-115. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Blackhurst DW, Gailey TA, Bagwell VC, et al. Benefits from a teen pregnancy program: neonatal outcomes potential cost savings. J S C Med Assoc. May 1975;92(5). [Medline]
    22. van den Heuvel JF, Groenhof TK, Veerbeek JH, et al. eHealth as the next-generation perinatal care: an overview of the literature. J Med Internet Res. Jun 5, 2018;20(6):e202. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Lupton D. The use and value of digital media for information about pregnancy and early motherhood: a focus group study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Jul 19, 2016;16(1):171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Kvalvik LG, Wilcox AJ, Skjærven R, Østbye T, Harmon QE. Term complications and subsequent risk of preterm birth: registry based study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1007. [CrossRef]
    25. Su RN, Zhu WW, Wei YM, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancy: a multicentre study in the Beijing population. Chronic Dis Transl Med. Dec 2015;1(4):197-202. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Popova S, Dozet D, O’Hanlon G, Temple V, Rehm J. Maternal alcohol use, adverse neonatal outcomes and pregnancy complications in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Jan 22, 2021;21(1):74. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Ross MG, Downey CA, Bemis-Heys R, Nguyen M, Jacques DL, Stanziano G. Prediction by maternal risk factors of neonatal intensive care admissions: evaluation of >59,000 women in national managed care programs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1999;181(4):835-842. [CrossRef]
    28. CDC/ATSDR SVI: data and documentation download. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2022. URL: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/data_documentation_download.html [Accessed 2024-09-17]
    29. Collins TE, Akselrod S, Altymysheva A, et al. The promise of digital health technologies for integrated care for maternal and child health and non-communicable diseases. BMJ. May 23, 2023;381:e071074. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Karwa S, Jahnke H, Brinson A, Shah N, Guille C, Henrich N. Association between doula use on a digital health platform and birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. Feb 1, 2024;143(2):175-183. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Brinson AK, Jahnke HR, Rubin-Miller L, et al. Digital health’s influence on the association between birth preference and vaginal birth. Birth. May 28, 2024. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Guille C, Henrich N, Brinson AK, Jahnke HR. Improving the management of maternal mental health with digital health care. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2024;6(1):23-32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Wade VA, Karnon J, Elshaug AG, Hiller JE. A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC Health Serv Res. Aug 10, 2010;10(1):233. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Peahl AF, Smith RD, Moniz MH. Prenatal care redesign: creating flexible maternity care models through virtual care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2020;223(3):389. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Peahl AF, Gourevitch RA, Luo EM, et al. Right-sizing prenatal care to meet patients’ needs and improve maternity care value. Obstet Gynecol. May 2020;135(5):1027-1037. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Moise IK, Ivanova N, Wilson C, Wilson S, Halwindi H, Spika VM. Lessons from digital technology-enabled health interventions implemented during the coronavirus pandemic to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a global scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Mar 20, 2023;23(1):195. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Xie W, Dai P, Qin Y, Wu M, Yang B, Yu X. Effectiveness of telemedicine for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of 32 randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. Apr 6, 2020;20(1):198. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int. 2021;2:100117. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Beresford L, Norwood T. Can physical therapy deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function through a mobile app? An observational retrospective study. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. Jun 2022;4(2):100186. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Wu J, Napoleone J, Linke S, et al. Long-term results of a digital hypertension self-management program: retrospective cohort study. JMIR Cardio. Aug 24, 2023;7:e43489. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AOR: adjusted odds ratio
    NICU: neonatal intensive care unit
    SVI: Social Vulnerability Index

    Edited by Sherif Badawy; submitted 23.01.24; peer-reviewed by Jonas Wolf, Valentin Nicolae Varlas; final revised version received 13.08.24; accepted 19.08.24; published 16.10.24.

    Copyright

    © Alison K Brinson, Hannah R Jahnke, Natalie Henrich, Christa Moss, Neel Shah. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 16.10.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.