This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Infrastructures and Registries (44) Mental Health Issues in Adolescence (380) Social Media for Parenting (36) Support for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health/Substance Use Issues (38)

Published on in Vol 6 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/48201, first published .
Using a Design Thinking Approach to Develop a Social Media–Based Parenting Program for Parents of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

Using a Design Thinking Approach to Develop a Social Media–Based Parenting Program for Parents of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

Using a Design Thinking Approach to Develop a Social Media–Based Parenting Program for Parents of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Umaporn Yam-Ubon1 Author Orcid Image ;   Therdpong Thongseiratch2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (3) Metrics

    1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, , Songkhla, , Thailand

    2Songklanagarind ADHD Multidisciplinary Assessment and Care Team for Quality Improvement, Child Development Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, , Songkhla, , Thailand

    Corresponding Author:

    Therdpong Thongseiratch, MSc, MD


    Background: Parenting programs have proven effective in improving the behavior of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, barriers such as job and transportation constraints hinder parents from attending face-to-face therapy appointments. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these challenges.

    Objective: This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a social media–based parenting program for parents of children with ADHD, considering both the pre-existing challenges faced by parents and the additional barriers imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Methods: This study used a 5-stage design thinking process, encompassing empathizing with parents, defining their needs, ideating innovative solutions, prototyping the program, and testing the program with parents. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 parents of children with ADHD to understand their unique needs and values. Brainstorming techniques were used to generate creative ideas, leading to the creation of a prototype that was tested with 32 parents. Participants’ engagement with the program was measured, and posttraining feedback was collected to assess the program’s effectiveness.

    Results: Parents of children with ADHD encounter specific challenges, including managing impulsive behavior and difficulties in emotion regulation. The social media–based parenting program was delivered through the LINE app (Line Corporation) and consisted of 7 modules addressing topics related to ADHD management and effective parenting strategies. The program exhibited a high completion rate, with 84% (27/32) of participants successfully finishing it. Program provider–participant interaction peaked during the first week and gradually decreased over time. Qualitative feedback indicated that the program was feasible, accessible, and well received by participants. The LINE app was found to be convenient and helpful, and participants preferred content delivery once or twice per week, expressing acceptance for various content formats.

    Conclusions: This study emphasizes the significance of adopting a human-centered design thinking approach to develop parenting programs that cater to the unique needs and values of parents. By leveraging social media platforms, such as LINE, a parenting program can overcome the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and other constraints faced by parents. LINE offers a viable and feasible option for supporting parents of children with ADHD, with the potential for customization and widespread dissemination beyond the pandemic context.

    JMIR Pediatr Parent 2023;6(1):e48201

    doi:10.2196/48201

    Keywords

    attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ADHD; parenting programs; human-centered design thinking; online interventions; COVID-19 pandemic; children; development; online parenting program; parenting; behavior; support; feasibility; social media; prototype; testing; design 


    Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent psychological condition among school-aged children, affecting approximately 7.2% of children and adolescents aged ≤18 years [1]. ADHD is associated with a range of negative consequences, including academic difficulties, impaired social relationships, and compromised quality of life, for both children and their families [2,3].

    In the management of ADHD, parenting programs and medication are recognized as crucial components. Although medication can help manage symptoms, it is often insufficient to address the complex challenges associated with ADHD, without the support and guidance provided by parenting programs [4,5]. Parenting programs have shown effectiveness in reducing children’s disruptive behaviors and improving their adaptive functioning, making them a recommended primary intervention for managing ADHD symptoms [6,7]. These programs typically involve systematic interventions designed to educate and empower parents in effectively managing their child’s ADHD-related behaviors and challenges, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the child’s overall well-being [8,9].

    Traditionally, parenting programs have been delivered through face-to-face group sessions, wherein parents from different families come together at a designated clinic or primary care unit [10]. Although some programs may offer in-home training, group-based face-to-face sessions have been the preferred format for managing ADHD symptoms. However, these programs encounter numerous structural barriers that limit their accessibility and impact. These barriers include financial constraints, limited resources, logistical challenges, time constraints, the lack of available childcare, and scheduling conflicts [11]. In addition to these structural barriers, there may be negative attitudes toward seeking mental health services for children, which can deter parents from engaging in group-based parenting programs [12,13].

    The generalizability and effectiveness of traditional parenting programs may also be limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where socioeconomic conditions and health care systems differ significantly from those of high-income countries. Factors such as inadequate family income and limited access to mental health services can significantly moderate treatment outcomes [14]. Furthermore, the scarcity of trained mental health professionals in LMICs raises concerns about the feasibility and sustainability of therapist-delivered interventions [15]. Research on parenting programs in LMICs is relatively limited, and the delivery of such programs faces additional barriers, including the lack of a skilled and trained workforce and limited resources for supporting the implementation and dissemination of evidence-based interventions [16,17]. These challenges are further exacerbated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which has introduced additional barriers and limitations to the delivery of parenting programs.

    The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted many aspects of daily life, including access to health care services and support programs. Parents of children with ADHD have faced significant challenges in accessing and completing parenting programs during this time [18]. Lockdown measures and restrictions have resulted in increased behavioral problems among children with ADHD due to reduced opportunities for social interaction and disrupted routines [19]. Moreover, the pandemic has exacerbated parenting-related fatigue and psychological distress, further straining the well-being of parents [20]. Research has shown that parent support programs implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic have been associated with lower levels of parental stress and improved well-being [21].

    To address the challenges faced by parents both during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond, it is essential to prioritize the accessibility and effectiveness of parenting programs [22]. Social media–based programs have emerged as a promising solution, offering convenient and cost-effective interventions for various health issues, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, and certain mental health problems [23]. Social media–based programs provide higher accessibility rates than those of traditional face-to-face methods, allowing for timely intervention and support as soon as prodromal symptoms appear [24]. However, it is important to acknowledge that existing social media–based parenting programs have primarily been commercially driven [25], lacking effective bidirectional communication between parents and program providers [26-29], and have not undergone sufficient research to establish their efficacy in managing ADHD symptoms. Therefore, there is a need for evidence- and social media–based parenting programs specifically designed to address the unique challenges of managing ADHD.


    Setting

    This study, which is part of a social media–based parenting program project, took place at a large university hospital in Songkhla, Thailand, during June 2020 (the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand). A multidisciplinary team of health care professionals, including 1 general pediatrician, 2 developmental-behavioral pediatricians, 1 developmental-behavioral nurse, and 2 child psychologists, developed and coordinated the program.

    Ethics Approval

    The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (research ethics committee number: 62-381-1-1).

    Study Design

    We used a mixed methods approach, which involved participatory action research [30] and a design thinking process [31,32], to develop a social media–based parenting program for parents and caregivers of children with ADHD. The 5-step design thinking model from Stanford University’s Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design (d. school) was used, including empathy, define, ideate, prototype, and test [33,34].

    Phase 1: Empathy

    Semistructured in-depth interviews with parents and caregivers of children with ADHD were conducted to understand their challenges, problem-solving abilities, and preferences for a social media–based parenting program [35]. Demographic information was also collected.

    Phase 2: Define

    The research team synthesized the information from the interviews into a point-of-view statement [36], ensuring that it met the needs of the end users [35,37]. A group discussion refined the definition of parental requirements.

    Phase 3: Ideate

    Ideas for addressing the challenges and meeting the needs of parents were brainstormed, focusing on the creation of innovative solutions for the program content and features. Visual representations and structured brainstorming sessions facilitated the process [35,37].

    Phase 4: Prototype

    One or more prototypes were developed based on the previous phases’ data. Rapid feedback was collected during testing to determine end users' needs, and this feedback was used to further develop the prototype toward its full potential [35,37].

    Phase 5: Test

    Feedback from users was collected after the prototype’s launch [35,38]. Data on parental engagement and feedback on both benefits and potential negative interactions were used to refine the parent training program.

    This study evaluated the five phases of the design thinking process, assigning distinct study populations to each stage based on the phase-related objectives. Data were collected from parents and caregivers of children with ADHD during the empathizing phase [39]. Afterward, during the ideation phase, these data were integrated into the initial program design and discussed with multidisciplinary health care professionals, including general pediatricians, developmental-behavioral pediatricians, developmental-behavioral nurses, and child psychologists. A prototype [38] was subsequently created and tested with parents and caregivers of children with ADHD. The participants in the test phase included those who were engaged in the empathizing phase, as well as new participants who were recruited specifically to increase the saturation of the findings of the testing phase. Posttraining feedback was collected, and participant engagement with the program was evaluated in the testing phase (Table 1).

    Table 1. The five phases of the design thinking process and the methods used.
    PhaseConceptsMethodsParticipants
    EmpathyTo discover users’ needs and values for a familial technology-based solutionIn-depth interviews18 parents
    DefineTo refine and narrow the definition in the revised solution to meed the end users\' needsBrainstorming techniqueThe research team
    IdeateTo concentrate on idea generation and obtain innovative solutions for usersBrainstorming techniqueThe research team
    PrototypeTo generate the demonstrative solution for usersDesign a web-based prototype for trial useThe research team
    TestTo obtain pilot results and feedback on the prototypeCollect feedback via a quantitative and qualitative approach32 parents

    Data Collection

    To assess participant engagement, a manual text mining script was used to extract full transcripts of messages from moderators, researchers, and participants. These messages were categorized as text, images, videos, stickers, and audio messages. In addition to engagement, qualitative research was conducted during the empathy and test phases to gather data on parents’ needs, their perceptions, and lessons learned from the groups. Participants answered an open-ended questionnaire at the empathy phase and participated in in-depth interviews during the test phase.

    Data Analysis

    The engagement analysis involved calculating the total number of messages per topic and the frequency of messages sent per week by mothers and moderators. The frequency of messages, according to the day of the week and time of the day, was also evaluated to estimate mothers’ most active moments in social media groups. In terms of the qualitative analysis, a grounded theory approach was adopted. The research team read all in-depth interview transcripts, identified emergent patterns, and used inductive coding to pinpoint key themes and concepts. Text was extracted from transcriptions to generate analysis content, themes, and findings, which were subsequently translated to English.


    Phase 1: Empathy

    Participant Characteristics

    A total of 18 participants (primarily mothers), with a mean age of 42 years, were enrolled in this phase. The demographic data can be found in Table 2. Over half of the participants (10/18, 56%) had a bachelor’s degree or higher. The qualitative research involved a thematic analysis and identified 8 themes, which are discussed below.

    Table 2. Summary data of participants (N=18) in the empathy phase.
    CharacteristicValue
    Age (years), mean (range)42 (25-55)
    Relationship, n (%)
    Father4 (22)
    Mother11 (61)
    Grandmother2 (11)
    Aunt1 (6)
    Education, n (%)
    Primary school1 (6)
    High school3 (17)
    Diploma4 (22)
    Bachelor’s degree7 (39)
    Master’s degree3 (17)
    Occupation, n (%)
    Government official4 (22)
    Businessman2 (11)
    Freelance6 (33)
    Gardener2 (11)
    Merchant3 (17)
    Housewife1 (6)
    Theme 1: Parenting Problems

    Participants expressed concerns about their children’s behavior and its impact on their own mental health (eg, “Not only is unfinished homework the most common childrearing issue, but parents' mental health is also important in childrearing management”).

    Theme 2: Parental Needs

    Parents expressed a desire to learn techniques to help their children academically and emotionally (eg, “I’d like to learn the technique so that I can help him improve his academic performance”).

    Theme 3: Target Problems to Resolve

    Participants identified their children’s primary issues, such as a lack of focus, disobedience, and a lack of self-control (eg, “I wish he was focused on my words, obedient, and capable of self-control”).

    Theme 4: Internet Use Behavior

    Parents shared information about their preferred electronic devices and social media–based platforms (eg, “I have a smartphone and a PC. In my daily existence, I frequently utilize LINE, Facebook, and Google”).

    Theme 5: Frequency, Duration, and Time Periods

    Participants discussed their daily internet usage habits and preferred times for intervention (eg, “I use my cellphone for 1–2 hours a day, between the hours of 8 and 10p.m.”).

    Theme 6: Media Types

    Parents indicated their preferred media formats for the parenting program, such as infographics and videos (eg, “I recommend infographics and brief video clips”).

    Theme 7: Individual Versus Group Counseling

    Participants debated the merits of individual versus group counseling for addressing parenting issues (eg, “If the program is set up in a group setting, we may share experiences and track the development of the children”).

    Theme 8: Target Recipients

    Parents highlighted the importance of involving all family members in the parenting intervention (eg, “Information should be sent to the parents, grandparents, and grandfather due to possible inconsistencies in childrearing within the family”).

    Phase 2: Define

    In this phase, the research team, consisting of developmental-behavioral pediatricians, general pediatricians, a developmental-behavioral pediatrics nurse, and a psychologist, aimed to incorporate user requirements from the previous phase into the problem statement. They identified the users as “parents and caregivers of children with ADHD” and determined their critical need to be “learning parenting techniques” to help ameliorate their children’s behavioral problems.

    Through the analysis of the empathize phase, the team gained real insights into the parents’ and caregivers’ perspectives. Parents expressed feelings of being overwhelmed and sometimes felt helpless in the face of their children’s ADHD-related challenges. They also emphasized the importance of practical and easily applicable solutions that could seamlessly be integrated into their daily routines. The point-of-view statement, which was formulated based on these insights, was as follows:

    Parents and caregivers of children with ADHD need effective parenting techniques and support to improve their children’s behavior and overall well-being, while addressing their own emotional needs and fostering a sense of empowerment.

    The insight synthesized from the data denoted the desire “to improve the behavioral issues of children with ADHD.” This understanding led to the formulation of a “How Might We” (HMW) statement, which serves as a driving question to inspire innovative solutions. The HMW statement developed was as follows:

    How might we create a supportive and accessible program that equips parents and caregivers of children with ADHD with the necessary parenting techniques to effectively manage their children’s behavioral challenges and improve their overall well-being, while also addressing their emotional needs and fostering a sense of empowerment?

    Phase 3: Ideate

    The ideation phase began with the development team discussing potential solutions, using the HMW statement as a guide. The facilitator led a roundtable discussion centered around the HMW question.

    To ensure a diverse range of ideas during the brainstorming session, the team used the “Work Alone Together” technique. This method allowed individual team members to generate ideas independently before sharing them with the group. This approach fostered creativity and encouraged the team to explore multiple channels, formats, and platforms for the parenting program, such as using social media, videoconferencing, booklets, podcasts, and group meetings to deliver the program content.

    After the brainstorming session, the team used an affinity map (Textbox 1) to categorize and organize the generated ideas. This process allowed them to identify similarities, relationships, and patterns among the concepts. The affinity map included categories like LINE (Line Corporation), Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc), YouTube (YouTube LLC) or videos, videoconferences, booklets, lists, group meetings, telephone counseling, e-counseling, podcasts, behavioral tutorials, and television advertising.

    Affinity mapping.
    1. LINE (Line Corporation)
      • LINE group
      • Parent LINE group
      • LINE group: parents and teacher
      • Individual LINE
    2. Facebook (Meta Platforms Inc)
      • Facebook: changing behavior
      • Facebook page for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
      • Facebook pages
      • Facebook group of ADHD caregivers
    3. YouTube (YouTube LLC) or videos
      • Suggested list of videos in YouTube
      • Develop video scenarios for behavioral management (published via a YouTube channel)
      • Videos describing common behavioral problems
    4. Videoconferences
      • Use Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc) program for tracking behavioral problems
    5. Booklets
      • Booklet for behavioral management
      • Brochure
      • Question-and-answer brochure about common behavioral problems
    6. Lists
      • List of interesting Facebook pages
      • Lists of websites about parenting
      • Suggest websites about ADHD
    7. Group meetings
      • Group meeting for ADHD caregivers
      • Parent group meeting
    8. Telephone counseling
    9. e-Counseling
      • Advise behavioral management
      • Target behavior according to age
    10. Podcast: parenting management
    11. Behavioral tutorial via teacher
    12. Television advertising at schools and hospitals
    Textbox 1. Affinity mapping.

    The team used a prioritization map (Figure 1) to rank the ideas. Before using the member voting technique, they arranged the ideas in the four quadrants of the prioritization map. This approach helped them evaluate the importance and feasibility of each idea. After organizing the ideas in the quadrants, the team voted to determine the most effective and straightforward platform for developing the parent training program. The results indicated that LINE was the preferred choice. Consequently, LINE was chosen as the social media platform for content delivery in this study. The ideation phase also resulted in the creation of prototypes for the proposed parent training programs, which included text messages, infographics, videos, and assignments. Weekly learning goals were set, and samples of content for end users were designed.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Prioritization map.

    Phase 4: Prototype

    The prototype phase involved the development of a comprehensive social media–based parent training program, based on the insights and ideas gathered in the previous three phases of the design thinking process. The prototype consisted of a LINE-based parenting program, which included various components, such as content creation, user experience (UX) development of infographics, and video clip production, to provide parenting models for parents and caregivers.

    Content Prototype

    The content prototype was designed to address the needs and preferences of the target users. The team developed a curriculum of 7 parent training modules, which were to be completed over a 7-week intervention period. Each module covered a specific topic related to parenting children with ADHD and offered practical strategies, advice, and tips. The content was delivered through a combination of text messages, infographics, videos, and assignments, ensuring that the program was engaging, informative, and easy to follow (Table 3).

    Table 3. Prototype LINE-based parenting contents.
    Weeks and daysContents
    Weeks 1-2Introduction
     Day 1Program introduction
     Days 1-2Understanding ADHDa
     Day 3Treatment of ADHD
     Day 4Case scenario video (homework)
     Day 5Parental concern and setting goal
     Day 6Rationale, rule, and cycle of problem
     Days 6-7Basic principles in child behavioral management
     Day 8Advantage of parent training
     Days 9-10ABCb model (homework)
     Days 11-12Problem solutions
     Days 13-14Summary and discussion
    Week 3Basic communication skills
     Day 1Inappropriate conversations (homework)
     Days 1-2Negative conversations
     Days 3-4Using “I” messages and “you/he/she” messages
     Day 5Effective communication
     Day 6Constructive instruction
     Day 7Case scenario video (homework)
    Week 4Praise
     Day 1Praise
     Day 2Case scenario video (homework)
     Day 3Principles, components, and examples
     Days 3-6Diary notes
     Days 5-7Reminders about basic communication skills
     Day 7Reflection
    Week 5Rewards
     Day 1Types of rewards
     Day 2Principles of rewards
     Day 3Define target behaviors
     Days 4-6Reflection and technique suggestion
     Days 4-6Diary notes
     Day 7Summary and discussion
     Day 7Reminders about previous skills
    Week 6How to deal with behavioral problems
     Day 1Objectives and principles of behavioral management
     Day 2Effective behavioral management
     Day 3Time-out
     Day 4Verbal command
     Day 4Ignorance
     Days 5-6Case scenario video (homework)
     Days 2-6Sharing the experiences
     Days 2-6Diary notes
     Day 7Summary and discussion
    Week 7How to deal with homework
     Day 1Principles of doing homework
     Day 2How to deal with homework
     Day 3Behavioral management
     Day 4Self-reporting card
     Days 2-7Sharing the experiences
     Days 2-7Diary notes
     Day 7Summary and discussion

    aADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    bABC: Antecedent, Behavior, and Consequences.

    UX Development and Parent Interaction

    In order to create a visually appealing, user-friendly experience that also facilitated meaningful interaction among parents, the team focused on the design of infographics and on fostering engagement among users. The infographics were designed to be clear, concise, and informative, presenting complex information in an easily digestible format. They included visuals, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points and concepts, making it easier for parents to understand and apply the strategies discussed in the program. To promote interaction and engagement, the team incorporated features that encouraged parents to share their experiences, ask questions, and provide support to one another. This was achieved through the creation of a dedicated LINE group, wherein users could engage in discussions, share their progress, and seek advice from both experts and fellow parents. The group also served as a platform for sharing additional resources, hosting live question-and-answer sessions, and conducting polls to gather feedback and gauge user satisfaction. By fostering a sense of community and providing opportunities for interaction, the UX development aimed to enhance the overall effectiveness and appeal of the program (Figure 2).

    ‎
    Figure 2. Example of a conversation through a moderated LINE group.
    Video Clip Production

    To further enhance the program’s effectiveness and user engagement, the team produced a series of video clips that demonstrated various parenting models and techniques. These videos featured expert advice, real-life examples, and step-by-step instructions to help parents and caregivers better understand and apply the strategies discussed in the program. The videos were designed to be short, focused, and easy to access, allowing users to watch them at their convenience.

    Prototype Evaluation

    Once the initial prototype was complete, it was evaluated by a group of parents and caregivers who participated in a pilot testing phase. Participants completed a web-based eligibility screening and informed consent process as part of the baseline survey. Those who met the eligibility criteria and provided their consent were directed to complete comprehensive baseline surveys. Participants received a general schedule for the completion of the seven parent training modules and were provided with approximately one or two inputs daily, between 6 PM and 9 PM. They were also given 2 assignments per week, with a 1-week deadline for completing the assigned tasks.

    The feedback gathered from the pilot testing phase was used to refine and improve the prototype, ensuring that it effectively addressed the needs and preferences of the target users. The final prototype of the LINE-based parenting program was then prepared for implementation and further evaluation.

    Phase 5: Test

    Participants

    A total of 32 participants from 24 families, who were parents or caregivers of children (aged 4 to 10 years) diagnosed with ADHD, were enrolled in this phase. Participants included mothers (20/32, 63%) and primary caregivers (29/32, 91%) with a bachelor’s degree. Most children were boys aged 8 to 10 years who were receiving medication as primary treatment (24/32, 75%).

    Participant Engagement in the Program

    Engagement was assessed by tracking the content marked as “read” in the LINE app every week over the 7-week intervention period. The responses to interventions were categorized on a 4-point scale (0=unread; 1=only read; 2=interaction with the intervention [posting a sticker, responding with “OK,” or writing “thank you”]; 3=initiating a discussion or asking a question). A score of 46 represented that the participant had read all the content, while scores above 46 indicated that they read and interacted with the program providers. Table 4 illustrates the distribution of participants’ levels of engagement with the program, showing that the majority of them (16/32, 50%) completed the intervention, while 34% (11/32) demonstrated higher engagement by actively interacting with the content. On the other hand, 16% (5/32) of the participants were classified as nonadherent, indicating a lower level of engagement with the program.

    Table 4. Classification of patient engagement scores.
    ClassificationScoreParticipants (N=32), n (%)
    Nonadherence<465 (16)
    Completion4616 (50)
    Adherence>4611 (34)

    Participants’ engagement levels were charted by using a linear graph, which depicted their levels of interaction with the content over the 7-week period (Figure 3). The first week showed the highest engagement levels, which gradually decreased over time, reaching the lowest point in the last week.

    These data highlight the overall participant engagement in the program and how it evolved throughout the intervention.

    ‎
    Figure 3. Response from intervention.

    Posttraining Feedback

    Qualitative data were collected from 32 participants via in-depth interviews after they completed the LINE parenting program. The following four themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) social media platform, (2) internet use behavior, (3) content formats, and (4) intervention adherence.

    Theme 1: Social Media Platform

    Participants found the LINE app to be convenient and accessible, accessing it daily. They appreciated being able to save and review images and videos. One participant said:

    LINE is convenient, but an OPD visit is still necessary because when the doctor speaks to my son, he listens and follows your advice.
    Theme 2: Internet Use Behavior

    Participants often read the content at night or on weekends, and the daily delivery of content was considered appropriate. Primary caregivers preferred daily content delivery, while others favored weekly delivery. A participant stated:

    I read the content on weekdays, after 21:00. Frequency of content delivery is acceptable at about 2–3 times per day.
    Theme 3: Content Formats

    All content formats were deemed acceptable, and participants found Google Forms (Google LLC) to be user-friendly for assignments and questionnaires. They suggested the addition of more video clips that demonstrate communication techniques. One participant made the following suggestion:

    Google forms make it simple to complete assignments and questionnaires. Some content should be adjusted to reflect the child’s age and developmental stage.
    Theme 4: Intervention Adherence

    Participants applied the praising and communication skills from the modules in their daily lives. Many believed that a parenting program is suitable for primary caregivers, though some recommended adaptations for specific situations. For example, a participant said:

    A parenting program is appropriate for primary caregivers. If the recipient is not the primary caregiver, the content should be delivered at a slower rate.

    Principal Findings

    The innovative social media–based parenting program, which was developed through a design thinking process, demonstrates the potential of leveraging familiar and accessible platforms to address the needs of parents and caregivers of children with ADHD. By using the LINE app, the program delivered content in varied formats, offering valuable ADHD information, parenting guidance, assignments, and screen-to-screen consultations. This approach made the program accessible, feasible, and acceptable for Thai parents, who found it convenient to save and review information as needed. The success of the program can be attributed to the incorporation of the participants’ needs and values, its feasibility, and its acceptability, as evidenced by the high retention rate and qualitative feedback.

    The internet use behaviors observed in this study, such as preferred communication times and the use of familiar social media apps, align with previous research [40-45]. This highlights the importance of considering user preferences and behaviors in the development of social media–based interventions, as doing so can increase engagement, effectiveness, and acceptability. The use of the LINE app facilitated user engagement, as it was familiar, simple, and accessible. This supports the notion that promoting credible social media sites and educating users on proper social media use can help reduce misinformation regarding parenting issues [46-50]. Additionally, using a platform that users are familiar with can minimize barriers to access and improve UX.

    The content, structure, and delivery of the program were crucial factors that contributed to its feasibility and acceptability. Participants appreciated the convenience of receiving the program through the LINE app, which they used daily. The praise-focused content was particularly interesting to the participants, in line with a previous meta-analysis that found a large effect size for praise, reward, and logical sequence techniques [8]. The program’s flexible structure allowed parents to engage with the content at their preferred times and facilitated the sharing of content with other individuals facing similar challenges.

    Participants were highly engaged with the program, with 84% (27/32) of participants expressing interest in the intervention. Parents were familiar with the LINE app and discussed their children’s behavioral difficulties. Although participants did not always respond immediately to the inputs, they reported reading the material later, saving photographs and video clips on their devices, and sharing the materials with others who faced similar problems with their children’s behavior. These engagement rates compare favorably with previous studies; Franke et al [51] found that 55% of participants completed all 8 modules of their intervention, while Baker et al [52] reported a retention rate of approximately 92.5% at postintervention assessment, with 81% of participants completing the 9-month follow-up evaluation.

    Participants believed that the program should also include other caregivers, but the content should be brief and summarized for nonprimary caregivers. Previous research has also shown that interactive programs are more effective in improving child behavior than noninteractive programs [47]. This highlights the importance of customization in social media–based parenting programs. Participants also provided valuable suggestions for improving the program, such as including more behavioral management video simulations and tailoring content to different family circumstances. These recommendations highlight the importance of continuously refining and adapting interventions to better address the specific needs and contexts of target populations. Customization and personalization have been shown to be significant factors in the success of social media–based parenting programs [8,9,53,54].

    Future Research and Implementation

    With regard to future research and implementation, human-centered solutions are necessary to reduce the gap between parents’ needs and the content and structure of parenting programs, particularly for parents of children with ADHD. Future studies should focus on personalization, engagement, and positive parental experiences to improve social media–based parenting programs. Additionally, more research is needed to understand how to optimize the integration of technology into parenting interventions, especially in LMICs, where resources and access to quality information may be limited. Collaboration among health care providers, researchers, and technology developers is essential for the creation of effective and accessible social media–based interventions. By working together, these stakeholders can ensure that evidence-based information and guidance are disseminated to parents and caregivers in an engaging, user-friendly format. Furthermore, public health organizations and educational institutions can play a critical role in promoting and supporting the adoption of such interventions within communities.

    Limitations

    This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the sample size was small, which may impact the statistical power of the quantitative findings. However, it is important to note that this study used a mixed methods approach, which allows for data saturation and ensures comprehensive exploration of the research questions beyond mere statistical power. Second, this study was conducted within a single institution; as such, there is a possibility of selection bias, and the findings many not be generalizable to a broader population. To address this limitation, future research should consider multicenter collaborations to include more diverse settings and participants, thereby enhancing the external validity of the findings. Additionally, volunteer bias may have influenced the results, as participants who volunteered for this study may have had characteristics or motivations that were distinct from those of nonparticipants. To mitigate this bias, future studies could explore recruitment strategies that reach a wider range of participants, aiming for a more representative sample.

    Conclusion

    This study provides evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a social media–based parenting program for Thai parents of children with ADHD. The program was developed by using a design thinking approach and delivered through the LINE app, a social media platform that was familiar and accessible to the participants. The program provided valuable technical skills related to nurturing children with ADHD and was well received by parents and caregivers. Future research on social media–based parenting programs should focus on personalization and on meeting the specific needs of parents and caregivers to improve long-term outcomes for children with ADHD and their families.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Thomas R, Sanders S, Doust J, Beller E, Glasziou P. Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015 Apr;135(4):e994-e1001 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Agnew-Blais JC, Polanczyk GV, Danese A, Wertz J, Moffitt TE, Arseneault L. Young adult mental health and functional outcomes among individuals with remitted, persistent and late-onset ADHD. Br J Psychiatry 2018 Sep;213(3):526-534 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Peters K, Jackson D. Mothers' experiences of parenting a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Adv Nurs 2009 Jan;65(1):62-71 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Daley D, Jones K, Hutchings J, Thompson M. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in pre-school children: current findings, recommended interventions and future directions. Child Care Health Dev 2009 Nov;35(6):754-766 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Barbaresi WJ, Campbell L, Diekroger EA, Froehlich TE, Liu YH, O’Malley E, et al. The Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with complex attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: process of care algorithms. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2020;41 Suppl 2S:S58-S74 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Nowak C, Heinrichs N. A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: effectiveness and moderating variables. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2008 Sep;11(3):114-144 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Dekkers TJ, Groenman AP, Wessels L, Kovshoff H, Hoekstra PJ, van den Hoofdakker BJ. Which factors determine clinicians' policy and attitudes towards medication and parent training for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022 Mar;31(3):483-493 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Leijten P, Gardner F, Melendez-Torres GJ, van Aar J, Hutchings J, Schulz S, et al. Meta-analyses: key parenting program components for disruptive child behavior. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2019 Feb;58(2):180-190 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Leijten P, Melendez-Torres GJ, Gardner F, van Aar J, Schulz S, Overbeek G. Are relationship enhancement and behavior management "the golden couple" for disruptive child behavior? Two meta-analyses. Child Dev 2018 Nov;89(6):1970-1982 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Shaffer A, Kotchick BA, Dorsey S, Forehand R. The past, present, and future of behavioral parent training: interventions for child and adolescent problem behavior. Behav Anal Today 2001;2(2):91-105 [CrossRef]
    11. Reardon T, Harvey K, Baranowska M, O’Brien D, Smith L, Creswell C. What do parents perceive are the barriers and facilitators to accessing psychological treatment for mental health problems in children and adolescents? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017 Jun;26(6):623-647 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Hansen AS, Telléus GK, Mohr-Jensen C, Lauritsen MB. Parent-perceived barriers to accessing services for their child's mental health problems. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2021 Jan 29;15(1):4 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Ohan JL, Visser TAW, Moss RG, Allen NB. Parents' stigmatizing attitudes toward psychiatric labels for ADHD and depression. Psychiatr Serv 2013 Dec 1;64(12):1270-1273 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Mejia A, Calam R, Sanders MR. A review of parenting programs in developing countries: opportunities and challenges for preventing emotional and behavioral difficulties in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2012 Jun;15(2):163-175 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Kakuma R, Minas H, van Ginneken N, Dal Poz MR, Desiraju K, Morris JE, et al. Human resources for mental health care: current situation and strategies for action. Lancet 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1654-1663 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Leijten P, Melendez-Torres GJ, Knerr W, Gardner F. Transported versus homegrown parenting interventions for reducing disruptive child behavior: a multilevel meta-regression study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016 Jul;55(7):610-617 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Parra-Cardona R, Leijten P, Lachman JM, Mejía A, Baumann AA, Amador Buenabad NG, et al. Strengthening a culture of prevention in low- and middle-income countries: balancing scientific expectations and contextual realities. Prev Sci 2021 Jan;22(1):7-17 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Summers J, Baribeau D, Mockford M, Goldhopf L, Ambrozewicz P, Szatmari P, et al. Supporting children with neurodevelopmental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2021 Jan;60(1):2-6 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Raviv T, Warren CM, Washburn JJ, Kanaley MK, Eihentale L, Goldenthal HJ, et al. Caregiver perceptions of children's psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2111103 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Marchetti D, Fontanesi L, Mazza C, Di Giandomenico S, Roma P, Verrocchio MC. Parenting-related exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 lockdown. J Pediatr Psychol 2020 Nov 1;45(10):1114-1123 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Brown SM, Doom JR, Lechuga-Peña S, Watamura SE, Koppels T. Stress and parenting during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl 2020 Dec;110(Pt 2):104699 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Baumel A, Pawar A, Mathur N, Kane JM, Correll CU. Technology-assisted parent training programs for children and adolescents with disruptive behaviors: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry 2017;78(8):e957-e969 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Fedele DA, Cushing CC, Fritz A, Amaro CM, Ortega A. Mobile health interventions for improving health outcomes in youth: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2017 May 1;171(5):461-469 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Lupton D, Pedersen S, Thomas GM. Parenting and digital media: from the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociol Compass 2016 Aug;10(8):730-743 [CrossRef]
    25. Breitenstein SM, Fogg L, Ocampo EV, Acosta DI, Gross D. Parent use and efficacy of a self-administered, tablet-based parent training intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 Apr 20;4(2):e36 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Morgan AJ, Rapee RM, Tamir E, Goharpey N, Salim A, McLellan LF, et al. Preventing anxiety problems in children with Cool Little Kids Online: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2015 Nov 5;16:507 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Ghaderi A, Kadesjö C, Björnsdotter A, Enebrink P. Randomized effectiveness trial of the Family Check-Up versus internet-delivered parent training (iComet) for families of children with conduct problems. Sci Rep 2018 Jul 31;8(1):11486 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Baumel A, Faber K. Evaluating Triple P Online: a digital parent training program for child behavior problems. Cogn Behav Pract 2018 Nov;25(4):538-543 [CrossRef]
    29. Florean IS, Dobrean A, Păsărelu CR, Georgescu RD, Milea I. The efficacy of internet-based parenting programs for children and adolescents with behavior problems: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2020 Dec;23(4):510-528 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Katoppo ML, Sudradjat I. Combining participatory action research (PAR) and design thinking (DT) as an alternative research method in architecture. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015 May;184:118-125 [CrossRef]
    31. Hahn-Goldberg S, Chaput A, Rosenberg-Yunger Z, Lunsky Y, Okrainec K, Guilcher S, et al. Tool development to improve medication information transfer to patients during transitions of care: a participatory action research and design thinking methodology approach. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022 Jan;18(1):2170-2177 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Wolcott MD, McLaughlin JE, Hubbard DK, Rider TR, Umstead K. Twelve tips to stimulate creative problem-solving with design thinking. Med Teach 2021 May;43(5):501-508 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Plattner H, Meinel C, Leifer L, editors. Design Thinking Research: Building Innovators. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2015. [CrossRef]
    34. Haesebaert J, Samson I, Lee-Gosselin H, Guay-Bélanger S, Proteau JF, Drouin G, et al. How to engage patients in research and quality improvement in community-based primary care settings: protocol for a participatory action research pilot study. Res Involv Engagem 2018 Oct 1;4:30 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University. An introduction to design thinking process guide. 2020. URL: web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf [accessed 2023-06-27]
    36. van der Westhuizen D, Conrad N, Douglas TS, Mutsvangwa T. Engaging communities on health innovation: experiences in implementing design thinking. Int Q Community Health Educ 2020 Oct;41(1):101-114 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Ku B, Lupton E. Health Design Thinking: Creating Products and Services for Better Health. Cambridge, United States: The MIT Press; 2020.
    38. Hou IC, Lan MF, Shen SH, Tsai PY, Chang KJ, Tai HC, et al. The development of a mobile health app for breast cancer self-management support in Taiwan: design thinking approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 Apr 30;8(4):e15780 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Salminen M, Hamari J, Ravaja N. Empathizing with the end user: effect of empathy and emotional intelligence on ideation. Creat Res J 2021 Jan 4;33(2):191-201 [CrossRef]
    40. Wolfers LN, Kitzmann S, Sauer S, Sommer N. Phone use while parenting: an observational study to assess the association of maternal sensitivity and smartphone use in a playground setting. Comput Hum Behav 2020 Jan;102:31-38 [CrossRef]
    41. Kim C, Kang KI, Lee N. Intergenerational transmissions of mother-adolescent smartphone dependency: the mediating role of negative parenting and the moderating role of gender. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5871 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Modecki KL, Low-Choy S, Uink BN, Vernon L, Correia H, Andrews K. Tuning into the real effect of smartphone use on parenting: a multiverse analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020 Aug;61(8):855-865 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Hooglugt F, Ludden GDS. A mobile app adopting an identity focus to promote physical activity (MoveDaily): iterative design study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 Jun 15;8(6):e16720 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Militello L, Melnyk BM, Hekler EB, Small L, Jacobson D. Automated behavioral text messaging and face-to-face intervention for parents of overweight or obese preschool children: results from a pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 Mar 14;4(1):e21 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Marko-Holguin M, Cordel SL, Van Voorhees BW, Fogel J, Sykes E, Fitzgibbon M, et al. A two-way interactive text messaging application for low-income patients with chronic medical conditions: design-thinking development approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 May 1;7(5):e11833 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Hagg E, Dahinten VS, Currie LM. The emerging use of social media for health-related purposes in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2018 Jul;115:92-105 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Baumel A, Pawar A, Kane JM, Correll CU. Digital parent training for children with disruptive behaviors: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2016 Oct;26(8):740-749 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Enebrink P, Högström J, Forster M, Ghaderi A. Internet-based parent management training: a randomized controlled study. Behav Res Ther 2012 Apr;50(4):240-249 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Morgan AJ, Rapee RM, Salim A, Goharpey N, Tamir E, McLellan LF, et al. Internet-delivered parenting program for prevention and early intervention of anxiety problems in young children: randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017 May;56(5):417-425.e1 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Sourander A, McGrath PJ, Ristkari T, Cunningham C, Huttunen J, Lingley-Pottie P, et al. Internet-assisted parent training intervention for disruptive behavior in 4-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2016 Apr;73(4):378-387 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Franke N, Keown LJ, Sanders MR. An RCT of an online parenting program for parents of preschool-aged children with ADHD symptoms. J Atten Disord 2020 Oct;24(12):1716-1726 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Baker S, Sanders MR, Turner KMT, Morawska A. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-intensity interactive online parenting intervention, Triple P Online Brief, with parents of children with early onset conduct problems. Behav Res Ther 2017 Apr;91:78-90 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Thongseiratch T, Leijten P, Melendez-Torres GJ. Online parent programs for children's behavioral problems: a meta-analytic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2020 Nov;29(11):1555-1568 [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Farao J, Malila B, Conrad N, Mutsvangwa T, Rangaka MX, Douglas TS. A user-centred design framework for mHealth. PLoS One 2020 Aug 19;15(8):e0237910 [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    HMW: How Might We
    LMIC: low- and middle-income country
    UX: user experience

    Edited by Sherif Badawy; submitted 15.04.23; peer-reviewed by Maha Gasmi, Surendra Gupta; final revised version received 06.06.23; accepted 13.06.23; published 28.07.23

    Copyright

    © Umaporn Yam-ubon, Therdpong Thongseiratch. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org), 28.7.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://pediatrics.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.