This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Pediatrics (139) Information Seeking, Information Needs (481) eHealth Literacy / Digital Literacy (396) Pediatrics (205) Design and Usability of Websites for Special User Groups (171) Learning and Education (77) Information Retrieval (296)

Published on in Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Jan-Mar

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/31820, first published .
Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study

Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study

Assessment of the Readability of Web-Based Patient Education Material From Major Canadian Pediatric Associations: Cross-sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Alice Man1 Author Orcid Image ;   Courtney van Ballegooie1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Martel-Côté N, Choquette R, Côté-Sergerie C, Lebel D, Bussières J, Tanguay C. Training workload in the investigational drug service of a university hospital center. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 2023 View
  2. Wang Y, Heidl A, Angeles P, Farnesi B, Alberga A, Cohen T. Assessment of electronic patient education materials for adolescent bariatric surgery candidates: An environment scan. PEC Innovation 2023;2:100143 View
  3. van Ballegooie C, Heroux D, Hoang P, Garg S. Assessing the Functional Accessibility, Actionability, and Quality of Patient Education Materials from Canadian Cancer Agencies. Current Oncology 2023;30(2):1439 View
  4. Furukawa E, Okuhara T, Okada H, Fujitomo Y, Osa M, Hashiba T, Kiuchi T. Evaluating the understandability and actionability of online educational videos on pre‐dialysis chronic kidney disease. Nephrology 2023;28(11):620 View
  5. Moons P, Van Bulck L. Using ChatGPT and Google Bard to improve the readability of written patient information: a proof of concept. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2024;23(2):122 View
  6. van Ballegooie C, Wen J, Ahmad D. Assessment of online patient education material for eye cancers: A cross-sectional study. PLOS Global Public Health 2023;3(10):e0001967 View
  7. Tao B, Handzic A, Hua N, Vosoughi A, Margolin E, Micieli J. Utility of ChatGPT for Automated Creation of Patient Education Handouts: An Application in Neuro-Ophthalmology: Response. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 2024;44(3):e496 View
  8. Furukawa E, Okuhara T, Okada H, Kiuchi T. Accessibility of COVID-19-related Public Websites in Japan. American Journal of Health Education 2024:1 View
  9. Loughran E, Kane M, Wyatt T, Kerley A, Lowe S, Li X. Using Large Language Models to Address Health Literacy in mHealth. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2024;42(10):696 View
  10. Graetz D, Velasquez T, Chitsike I, Halalsheh H, Cáceres-Serrano A, Fuentes L, Chokwenda N, Matsikidze E, Ferrara G, Bilbeisi T, Williams A, Bhakta N, Jeha S, Rodriguez Galindo C, Mack J, Santana V. Stigma in Pediatric Cancer: An Exploratory Study of Osteosarcoma and Retinoblastoma in Guatemala, Jordan, and Zimbabwe. JCO Global Oncology 2024;(10) View
  11. Tian Tran J, Burghall A, Blydt-Hansen T, Cammer A, Goldberg A, Hamiwka L, Johnson C, Kehler C, Phan V, Rosaasen N, Ruhl M, Strong J, Teoh C, Wichart J, Mansell H. Exploring the ability of ChatGPT to create quality patient education resources about kidney transplant. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;129:108400 View
  12. Halawani A, Almehmadi S, Alhubaishy B, Alnefaie Z, Hasan M. Empowering patients: how accurate and readable are large language models in renal cancer education. Frontiers in Oncology 2024;14 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Elahi E, Maqueda A, Lara J. Data Science and Algorithms in Systems. View