e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 46 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 22 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 7 JMIR Research Protocols
- 6 JMIR Human Factors
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The students’ experiences were assessed using a 6-item questionnaire with open and closed questions (Robotics R-questions Table 1).
The application behavior was analyzed and the usefulness of the teaching method was assessed.
Different robots built with the Lego Mindstorms construction kit.
Screenshot of the Lego Mindstorms application-based visual programming software.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58940
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Beetz et al [15], specify acceptance of assistive robotics as being based on trust. Human-related aspects such as cultural background, living conditions, or expectations toward the functionality of a robot as well as criteria of the robot itself such as design [6,32], language capability, or range of functions are relevant for the acceptance of an SR [6]; specifically, an anthropomorphic approach on the design of SR is deemed to be of high relevance [14].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63017
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Despite these challenges, the contribution of robotics to health care, including ICUs, remains seemingly promising [20].
Understanding clinician perceptions of robotics within the ICU is paramount, as it directly influences the adoption, use, and effectiveness of these technologies. This study aims to explore the multifaceted views of health care professionals on the deployment of robotics in the ICU, identifying perceived benefits, challenges, and areas for improvement.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e62957
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Automated Process for Monitoring of Amiodarone Treatment: Development and Evaluation
robotics
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65473
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Dynamic Augmented Reality Cues for Telementoring in Minimally Invasive Surgeries: Scoping Review
robotics
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63939
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Examples of PAI include robotics, intelligent sensors, autonomous vehicles, and other cyberphysical systems that merge computational intelligence with physical functionalities [8-10].
AI-powered robotics in health care may offer a range of potential benefits that could revolutionize the field [11]. These systems provide precision and consistency in tasks, often surpassing human capabilities. Precision is particularly vital in surgeries to avoid adverse events and harm to patients.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e63641
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Within rehabilitation, this may involve devices such as virtual reality, robotics, smartphone apps and activity trackers [4]. While evidence is emerging, research has shown digital interventions can improve patient outcomes (eg, in mobility and upper limb function) [5-9], improve patient engagement in rehabilitation [10-13], and increase therapy dosage [6,14,15].
As technologies advance and become more affordable [16-18], they are increasingly accessible in rehabilitation [10,19,20].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e60374
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cocreative Development of Robotic Interaction Systems for Health Care: Scoping Review
The medical journalist Nicole Janke [2] suggests that the main barriers to the use of robotics in health care are the lack of controllability, the lack of adaptability, and the complexity of control functions for changing users, contexts of use, and suitability for the user. The current inflexibility is one of the reasons for the rather low penetration of already available robotic systems in everyday life and, especially, in care.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e58046
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Similarly, in their exploratory study conducted in the context of long-term care facilities with Pepper (Soft Bank Robotics), a semihumanoid social robot, Blindheim et al [33] suggested that Pepper’s presence increased communal activities involving the social robot in terms of physical activity, human-robot interaction, social stimulation, and communication among residents as well as between residents and employees.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e56669
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Advances in the Application of AI Robots in Critical Care: Scoping Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics are 2 distinct yet interconnected concepts ubiquitous in contemporary media and digital platforms. The term artificial intelligence was first introduced as a Medical Subject Heading in the US National Library of Medicine’s Pub Med database in 1986, defined as “Theory and development of computer systems which perform tasks that normally require human intelligence” [1].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54095
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS