e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 594 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 149 JMIR Formative Research
- 136 JMIR Human Factors
- 75 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 49 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 30 JMIR Research Protocols
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 21 JMIR Aging
- 19 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 15 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 JMIR Cancer
- 9 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 Iproceedings
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Finally, we will evaluate the acceptance and usability of the e MOM app.
This study is a secondary analysis of e MOM GDM RCT [20], where the intervention arm used the e MOM app with a CGM and activity bracelet for 1 week per month and a digital food diary for 3 days of this week (referred to as the ‘app week’ later in this paper), from gestational weeks 24-28 to delivery. The e MOM GDM study was conducted between February 2021 and December 2022 in Helsinki, Finland.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e60855
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Extended Reality Biofeedback for Functional Upper Limb Weakness: Mixed Methods Usability Evaluation
After completing all 3 tasks, participants filled out the system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire for each task. The SUS is a 10-item questionnaire yielding a score from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better perceived usability. We chose the SUS because it is a well-established, quick tool for usability assessment, suitable even for small samples [26]. Participants also provided written free-text feedback on their experience with each task and the overall platform.
JMIR XR Spatial Comput 2025;2:e68580
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Usability issues in medical devices can directly affect patient safety and treatment outcomes, often arising from deficiencies in UI design [12]. To mitigate such risks, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) introduced the IEC 62366 standard, which emphasizes the integration of usability engineering throughout the device development process, distinguishing between formative and summative evaluations [13-15].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60607
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Data are from a longitudinal mixed methods study to assess the usability of a newly developed m Health intervention for pediatric post-HCT medication management. The study was conducted at a large Midwestern children’s hospital from September 2021 to January 2023.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e66847
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Framing the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Concepts and Methods: Scoping Review
The interaction of users with innovation prototypes not only accelerates the identification of usability issues, highlighting improvement opportunities, but also strengthens the capacity of researchers to define cost and benefits evaluation methods that are propaedeutic to identify the return of investments also in terms of economic benefit.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e67350
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This pilot study, conducted in 2 phases, evaluated the digital dose tracker, co-designed by users, by assessing its feasibility, validity, and usability. Phase 1 focused on a usability study (n=9) conducted in a research setting. Phase 2 involved a clinical trial to assess the trackers’ feasibility and validity (n=15). The primary outcome for Phase 1 was usability, measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI).
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68129
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Next, we describe user and usability testing, which informed the final content and functionality of My Cancer Gene.
Summary of the 5 steps, methods, and outputs involved in the development of My Cancer Gene. Each step included feedback and input from both patients and genetic providers (N=395).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56282
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Before evaluating the effectiveness of a digital adaptation, it is critical to examine its use and sustainability [48,49], including usability, acceptability, and feasibility with end users. Usability is characterized by how well specific users achieve a predetermined goal with efficiency and satisfaction in a particular context [50]. Acceptability relates to how end users think and feel about a digital intervention, while feasibility relates to how well it can be deployed with end users [51-53].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e67685
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this regard, related concepts, such as usability, UX, or user-centered design (UCD), all of which contribute to physician satisfaction, need to be investigated. HCI assists in identifying system requirements, including text style, fonts, layout, graphics, and color. Meanwhile, usability focuses on efficiency, effectiveness, utility, ease of learning, and ease of assessment.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69333
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In contrast, usability, defined as the extent to which users can use an app to achieve specific objectives with efficiency, satisfaction, and effectiveness in a specified usage context, is crucial to reflect the quality and efficacy of digital health apps [8,9]. Therefore, a rigorous and validated usability evaluation tool is urgently warranted to produce objective usability results for digital health apps before their release.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67948
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS