e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 174 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 44 JMIR Formative Research
- 39 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 25 JMIR Human Factors
- 7 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 6 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 5 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 5 JMIR Serious Games
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR Aging
- 3 JMIR Medical Education
- 3 JMIR Mental Health
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Cardio
- 2 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Integrating Nurse Preferences Into AI-Based Scheduling Systems: Qualitative Study
Central interview questions by participant group in artificial intelligence (AI)–based nurse scheduling study. This table presents the key interview questions posed to different participant groups—supervisors, permanent nurses, and temporary staff—during qualitative focus group discussions conducted in Swiss health care institutions between May and June 2024.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67747
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The main interview questions were, “Have you learned something while using the e MOM app? If yes, what?” “Has the e MOM helped you to make changes in your lifestyle? If yes, how?” “What features of the e MOM were most useful for you?” “How would you develop the app?” The interview script is provided in Multimedia Appendix 1.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e60855
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program in Singapore: Ethnographic Study
The interview guide was developed based on the literature [32,33] and the clinical and methodological expertise of the research team members (SS and SK). The same trained female research assistant (DC) who collected the study data also conducted a pilot interview with one participant to evaluate the flow and relevance of the interview guide, ensuring alignment with the research objectives.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66107
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
At the end of the study, we asked therapists to participate in an interview for evaluation of the feasibility of using and implementing wearables in daily clinical care. Furthermore, the implementation activities and experiences during the study were carefully registered in meeting notes and a logbook.
Participants were provided with the Empatica E4 smartwatch [23]. This device was investigated and validated in former research [23].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65559
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Three unique tools were developed to solicit responses from the participants: (1) an observatory tool for the site visit (health facilities); (2) key informant interview guides; and (3) survey tools for health care providers, TBAs, and pregnant women. These tools differed for each group, ensuring the questions were tailored to their various contexts.
A 3-day workshop was organized in each of the 3 program states to gather the data collected from the field activities.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58577
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
SH conducted all interviews using semistructured questionnaires (Multimedia Appendix 1), which were developed based on the CFIR [31] and nonadoption abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability—complexity assessment tool interview guide [32]. All interviews took place between April 30 and July 1, 2024.
Recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim using the transcription function in Word (Microsoft).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66815
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Key elements were the participatory development of interview topic guides, joint moderation of focus groups (FGs), and subsequent discussion of preliminary results [56]. Similar participatory health research has shown that participatory evaluation processes with nonscientific co-researchers from a project’s dialogue population promotes the generation of transformative knowledge and facilitates shared decision-making in qualitative research, particularly between academic researchers and co-researchers [60].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e65106
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
At the end of the class, participants were invited for an interview. Participants who expressed interest were provided with detailed study information, a consent form, and the opportunity to ask questions. Recruitment and interview procedures were designed to limit the participants’ potential efforts to participate in the study. Procedures were conducted in a familiar context for the participants and required limited travel time and no digital skills.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60612
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
At the outset of each interview, the interviewer clearly articulated the objectives of the personalized automated smartphone app under development and provided an overview of the various phases of rehabilitation, including preoperation and inpatient and outpatient stages.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e59688
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The steps of thematic analysis were as follows:
Data Familiarization: all interview transcripts were thoroughly reviewed to immerse the research team in the data and gain an initial understanding of the content.
Coding: initial codes were generated to highlight recurring patterns, unique responses, and significant statements related to usability, engagement, and perceived effectiveness.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e67137
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS