Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 87 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Strategies and Tools for Electronic Health Records and Physician Workflow Alignment: Protocol for a Scoping Review

In addition, it will incorporate the recent methodological development on scoping reviews, the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist into the main framework [28] (Multimedia Appendix 1). Consulting stakeholders is a vital aspect of the scoping review method. In this study, a librarian from the Weldon Library at the University of Western Ontario helped develop the search strategy.

Oluwakemi Olufunmilayo Oluwole, Nicole Haggerty, Uche Ikenyei, Oluwabambi Tinuoye, Andreawan Honora, Mohammed Abass Issakah

JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60464

Aligning With the Goals of the Planetary Health Concept Regarding Ecological Sustainability and Digital Health: Scoping Review

Aligning With the Goals of the Planetary Health Concept Regarding Ecological Sustainability and Digital Health: Scoping Review

This scoping review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist [39,40] (Multimedia Appendix 1) without being registered under a protocol. This review investigated the impact of digitalization in health care on achieving environmental sustainability goals within the Planetary Health framework. The key research questions (RQs) were as follows: RQ1: What are the environmental benefits of health care digitalization?

Mathea Berger, Jan Peter Ehlers, Julia Nitsche

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71795

The Value of Remote Vital Signs Monitoring in Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Patients in Hospital at Home Programs or Postacute Medical Patients in the Community: Systematic Review

The Value of Remote Vital Signs Monitoring in Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Patients in Hospital at Home Programs or Postacute Medical Patients in the Community: Systematic Review

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, which can be found in the Multimedia Appendix 1. It was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42023388827) on January 17, 2023 [13]. A literature search was performed on January 16, 2023, using a search strategy approved by all authors in the following databases: Pub Med (MEDLINE), Embase, and Scopus.

Su-Ann Cheng, Shijie Ian Tan, Samuel Li Earn Goh, Stephanie Q Ko

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64753

The Effectiveness of Social Media Campaigns in Improving Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Health and Help-Seeking in High-Income Countries: Scoping Review

The Effectiveness of Social Media Campaigns in Improving Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Health and Help-Seeking in High-Income Countries: Scoping Review

This review is reported according to PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews; Multimedia Appendix 1) guidelines [31]. An experienced research librarian helped to develop the search strategy, which included a combination of subject headings and keyword searches for the key concepts of “Social Media,” “Mental Health,” “Health Knowledge,” “Attitudes,” “Stigma,” and “Help Seeking Behavior.”

Ruth Plackett, Jessica-Mae Steward, Angelos P Kassianos, Marvin Duenger, Patricia Schartau, Jessica Sheringham, Silvie Cooper, Lucy Biddle, Judi Kidger, Kate Walters

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68124

Evaluation of the Aspects of Digital Interventions That Successfully Support Weight Loss: Systematic Review With Component Network Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of the Aspects of Digital Interventions That Successfully Support Weight Loss: Systematic Review With Component Network Meta-Analysis

PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart summarizing the results of the literature search and screening for eligibility. Multimedia Appendix 3 provides information about the 68 prioritized studies.

Michael Nunns, Samantha Febrey, Rebecca Abbott, Jill Buckland, Rebecca Whear, Liz Shaw, Alison Bethel, Kate Boddy, Jo Thompson Coon, G.J. Melendez-Torres

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65443

Design, Application, and Actionability of US Public Health Data Dashboards: Scoping Review

Design, Application, and Actionability of US Public Health Data Dashboards: Scoping Review

This study followed the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews), which is the most up-to-date and advanced approach for conducting and reporting scoping reviews [25]. In the subsequent sections, we briefly describe the methodological processes implemented. Further details are available in the published protocol [26].

Gretchen Stahlman, Itzhak Yanovitzky, Miriam Kim

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65283

Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease: Bibliometric Analysis and a Scoping Review of Deep Learning for Freezing of Gait

Digital Biomarkers for Parkinson Disease: Bibliometric Analysis and a Scoping Review of Deep Learning for Freezing of Gait

AI: artificial intelligence; PRISMA-Sc R: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews; Wo S: Web of Science. The scoping review section of this study follows the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and reports the search strategy used for literature selection [30].

Wenhao Qi, Shiying Shen, Chaoqun dong, Mengjiao Zhao, Shuaiqi Zang, Xiaohong Zhu, Jiaqi Li, Bin Wang, Yankai Shi, Yongze Dong, Huajuan Shen, Junling Kang, Xiaodong Lu, Guowei Jiang, Jingsong Du, Eryi Shu, Qingbo Zhou, Jinghua Wang, Shihua Cao

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71560

Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review

Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews [35-37] and followed the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist for reporting [38]. The review protocol was registered in January 2024 on the Open Science Framework Registries [39].

Bethan M Treadgold, Neil S Coulson, John L Campbell, Jeffrey Lambert, Emma Pitchforth

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71140

Predictive Modeling of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Predictive Modeling of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study was carried out in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Multimedia Appendix 1) [12]. A thorough literature search was performed across 6 databases (Pub Med, Web of Science, Pro Quest, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane) up to December 29, 2024, to locate studies investigating the use of ML in predicting and diagnosing ARDS.

Jinxi Yang, Siyao Zeng, Shanpeng Cui, Junbo Zheng, Hongliang Wang

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66615

Effectiveness of eHealth for Medication Adherence in Renal Transplant Recipients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of eHealth for Medication Adherence in Renal Transplant Recipients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines (Multimedia Appendix 1). Ethics approval was not required for this systematic review by the authors’ institutional review board, as it exclusively analyzed existing published data. Before data collection, we formulated the research questions using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study Design framework.

Lili Zhou, Ke Cheng, Linbin Chen, Xinyi Hou, Jingjing Wan

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73520