Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Research Protocols
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The alcohol consumption eligibility criteria were selected to capture a heavy drinking population of young people, and were based on the Young Adults Alcohol Study conducted by Dietze et al [20].
It is expected to take approximately 4 weeks to recruit the desired sample size of 500 eligible participants, with calls occurring on 5 days of each week in the late afternoon and evening, and a team of approximately 6-10 staff undertaking calls on each shift.
JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(3):e14190
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

The EMI group showed a small and nonsignificant increase between baseline and follow-up in the mean (geometric) number of standard drinks consumed at the most recent heavy drinking occasion (M=12.5 vs M= 12.7). The EMA and control groups showed a nonsignificant decrease (EMA: M=13.8 vs M=11.8; control: M=12.3 vs M=11.6); these changes did not differ significantly between the groups (Wald χ22=1.6; P=.437) and the magnitude of the effects of the intervention were markedly small [38].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6(7):e149
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section