Search Results (1 to 6 of 6 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

The general data-tracking module for SMARTER trial management in the ADAM portal: (A) recruitment steps, (B) clinician dashboard, (C) participant report, (D) calendar, (E) randomization page, (F) 6-month assessment page, and (G) referral breakdown. ADAM: Awesome Data Acquisition Method.
After randomization, participants were asked to do daily SM during the 1-year study and complete 3 assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e50043
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Actual Use of Multiple Health Monitors Among Older Adults With Diabetes: Pilot Study
JMIR Aging 2020;3(1):e15995
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Patient Portal Use in Diabetes Management: Literature Review
An evidence grade of A, B, C, or E is assigned depending on the quality of the evidence. A grade A evidence is considered optimal because it is derived from large, well-designed clinical trials or meta-analyses; it is estimated to have the best chance to improve outcomes when applying the treatment to the appropriate population. Grade B ratings indicate supporting evidence from well-conducted cohort studies or case-control studies.
JMIR Diabetes 2018;3(4):e11199
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS