Search Results (1 to 8 of 8 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 4 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

Lyon et al [25] proposed key modifications to fit a CCM for the school setting for mental health care, including basing a care manager in school, allowing for flexible entry and treatments for a variety of mental health diagnoses, defining success both academically and medically, and incorporating school-wide supports. We carried these ideas forward to our school adaptation for type 1 diabetes.
JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e64096
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

IAM is a 4-item survey and the leading instrument for measuring clinical intervention and implementation strategy contextual fit with good internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.87) and adequate test-retest reliability (r=0.73). The goodness-of-fit interview is particularly well-suited to probe on clinical intervention and implementation strategy appropriateness issues identified through IAM. We will use content analysis to analyze goodness-of-fit interview data.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e65446
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Most relevant to our work, Lyon and Koerner [13] proposed preliminary heuristics for the implementability of EBPIs.
These heuristics are commonly taught for use in a process known as heuristic evaluation [78], in which experts in user research or design use them to review a prototype or product and identify potential problems. Practitioners also develop familiarity with common sets of heuristics or those specific to the domain in which they work and use them to guide design and not only evaluate it.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(6):e37585
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

use
Process: passive data collection of BIT use [35]
Gilbody et al (2016): to measure consumer-level adoption, log-in records were used to identify number of participants who accessed programs [22]
Perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the evidence-based practice to a given context
Individual provider, consumer, or administrator
Organization
Objective: assessment of perceived BIT fit with the context
Process: survey, interview, focus group, direct observation usability testing, and workflow studies
Lyon
J Med Internet Res 2019;21(1):e11752
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

The SAAS was adapted from existing measures of intervention and HIT acceptability, including the Usage Rating Profile Intervention [46], Treatment Acceptability Rating Form-Revised (TARF-R) [47], and Intervention Rating Profile-15 [48]. Versions of the SAAS have been shown to possess acceptable technical adequacy (alpha>.70) and criterion-related validity [49].
Four measures focused on provider workflow and behaviors.
J Med Internet Res 2018;20(6):e10197
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section