Search Results (1 to 10 of 2424 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 738 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 461 JMIR Research Protocols
- 258 JMIR Formative Research
- 187 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 101 JMIR Mental Health
- 74 JMIR Human Factors
- 70 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 66 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 59 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 47 JMIR Serious Games
- 46 JMIR Cancer
- 35 JMIR Cardio
- 35 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 32 Iproceedings
- 32 JMIR Aging
- 27 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 23 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 22 JMIR Medical Education
- 20 JMIRx Med
- 14 JMIR Dermatology
- 13 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 11 JMIR Diabetes
- 11 JMIR Infodemiology
- 11 JMIR Nursing
- 6 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 5 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
There was a difference in the total number of unique patients (n=47,517 vs n=44,247), the number of patient years (n=46,400 vs n=43,100), and the mean number of patients per practice (n=5940 vs n=5531). The latter difference was largely influenced by one outlier practice. We found no statistically significant differences in the demographic characteristics between the datasets, with all P values >0.5.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64628
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
People most commonly cared for a spouse or partner (n=77, 50%); a child, grandchild, or niece or nephew (n=24, 15%); a parent (n=17, 11%); a sibling (n=8, 5%); a friend or neighbor (n=6, 4%); or another person (n=23, 15%).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70206
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Addendum to "Harnessing ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis: Are We Ready?"
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68963
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The participants’ median age was 45 (IQR 34-53) years, and most were female (n=10, 53%). Most (n=7, 37%) patients had multiple Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition diagnoses. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, individuals experiencing symptoms resembling COVID-19 were not allowed to participate, resulting in smaller focus group sizes. The total sample size aligned with the recommended standards for meaningful analysis [43].
During the analysis, we found 7 themes.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65308
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Ranking of topics for inclusion in a patient-oriented research (POR) training program (N=73). Participants were asked to rank the listed topic from 1 to 6, with 1 being most important.
In total, 6 main areas of knowledge needs were identified through a synthesis of the open-ended survey questions. Respondents were seeking information about the “basics” of patient-oriented research, such as how to recruit patients.
J Particip Med 2025;17:e65485
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Among the participants who dropped out, the reasons included loss of contact (n=3) and hospitalization (n=1; see Figure 1). The overall intervention completion rate in the integrative m Health intervention group was nearly 80% (134/170, 78.8%). The average completion rates for individual components were as follows: workshop attendance, 63 out of 68 (93%); self-reported adherence to unsupervised outdoor practice sessions, 36 out of 51 (71%); and self-reported mobile app engagement, 35 out of 51 (69%).
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e69259
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
In total, 37 participants enrolled, with 10 withdrawing their participation over the course of the study (N=28; mean age 19.96, SD 1.23 years; 15/28, 54% women). Out of 28 participants, 13 (46%) identified as Latine, 10 (36%) as Asian, 3 (14%) as non-Latine White, and 1 (4%) participant as other. Participants’ demographic information is provided in Table 1.
Participants’ demographic information (N=28).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67964
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS