Search Results (1 to 10 of 1740 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 446 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 314 JMIR Research Protocols
- 190 JMIR Formative Research
- 160 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 91 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 80 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 60 JMIR Dermatology
- 59 JMIR Human Factors
- 51 JMIR Mental Health
- 49 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 32 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 30 JMIR Aging
- 27 JMIR Cancer
- 26 JMIR Medical Education
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 15 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 13 Iproceedings
- 13 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 12 JMIR Diabetes
- 11 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 10 JMIR Cardio
- 10 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 7 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The multiple logistic regression model was not statistically significant for online information seeking (N=86, χ212=19.2; P=.08). Age, gender, race and ethnicity, non–US born status, past therapy use, symptom severity, stigma, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward mental health treatment did not predict online information seeking.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e60628
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
However, there was a significant correlation (r=−0.496; P
In the Numberlink (NL) puzzle task [39], the SUS average was 93.38 (SD 5.72) for young adults, 93.33 (SD 6.25) for older adults, 83.39 (SD 11.79) for the oldest adults, 81.88 (SD 9.66) for people with PD, and 83.12 (SD 10.68) for those with HD. These scores reflected a statistically significant difference in usability ratings between groups (P=.02).
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e65252
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
One reported a significant difference between Gloreha training and conventional rehabilitation (P=.002) [28], while 1 trial reported a large effect size of Gloreha training (Cohen d=3.65) [29]. Lee et al [27] investigated the effect of Gloreha training on the upper extremity motor function through the Fugl-Mayer Assessment for upper extremity.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e68268
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Compared to nonusers, X users had a higher proportion of women (240/753, 31.87% vs 269/1269, 21.20%), higher academic faculty appointments, and a greater number of advanced degrees (all P
Characteristics and demographics of top hospital cardiologists on X, stratified by gender.
a Not on X versus on X.
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e66308
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The results in this table do not account for missing values or days with no survey forms received or no ninth item filled in the mood survey.
a Spearman correlation between Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total and SI score at ecological momentary assessment prompts was 0.47 (n=3176, P=10 and suicidal ideation score ≥1 was 0.32 (n=245, P
b Disregarding the episodic pattern.
c To understand the difference between “days between successive SI instances” and “episode duration” (refer to the episode data in Table 3),
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67745
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS