Search Results (1 to 10 of 420 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 76 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 56 JMIR Research Protocols
- 52 JMIR Formative Research
- 47 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 33 Iproceedings
- 23 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 20 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 18 JMIR Medical Education
- 16 JMIR Human Factors
- 14 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 10 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 6 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 6 JMIR Serious Games
- 5 JMIR Diabetes
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 4 JMIR Cardio
- 4 JMIR Dermatology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Mental Health
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Amiri et al [9] examined the attitudes and knowledge of medical, dental, and nursing students toward AI in health care. The findings revealed a moderate level of knowledge (3736/8491, 44%) and a generally positive attitude (5519/8491, 65%), suggesting a promising level of acceptance of AI technologies among health care students.
JMIR Nursing 2025;8:e71653
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The study by Vestergaard et al [48] did not use standardized outcomes compatible for pooling, and the study by Geraedts et al [53] was a single-arm study without a control group, preventing calculation of comparative effect sizes. Therefore, both were excluded from the meta-analysis [43-46]. Figures 2-4 show the overall treatment effect size and the results of each study on the BBS, TUG, and CS.
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e67146
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Gurland et al [29] showed that administering e PROMs on a tablet to 103 patients who are undergoing surgery resulted in a 96% response rate in comparison to 25% with a paper-based collection method. Furthermore, e PROMs have the potential to enhance patient-physician communication by offering real-time pain tracking and avoiding possible recall bias [30].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65271
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Examination of Chronic Sorrow Among Parents of Children With Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Study
This study received ethics approval from the institutional review board of the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SP23 J/144/09) on October 16, 2023, and the data collection lasted for 6 months.
Various measures were undertaken to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of participants. Although there was minimal risk involved, all measures to protect participants’ information were taken.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e65754
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Clinical Nurse Educators’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66712
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Di Lorito et al [46] found that such interventions can produce positive effects on cognitive abilities among people with MCI and dementia. Furthermore, Karakose et al [47] conducted a comprehensive bibliometric and science mapping analysis, revealing the evolving landscape of digital addiction research, which is pertinent to understanding user engagement with digital health tools.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e70177
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS